I agree.Hirundo tahitica Gm. is the correct name
I strongly suspect this name will not be available under the current rules.We thought at first that this work contained no new names, but we eventually found that, tucked away in the synonymy of Hypurolepis javanica (p. 32), a new genus, Hersepis, is proposed for H. taitensis !
If of any help?Sparrman, Anders. 1789.
Museum Carlsonianum, in quo novas et selectas Aves, coloribus ad vivum brevique descriptione illustratas. Fasc. 4.
- Stockholm.
Hirundo javanica AVES type # 305
[here, p.29.]
Hirundo javanica Sparrman 1789, p. -. Type # 305 .
Category: holotype . Type locality: Indonesia, Java. Collector: C.Hornstedt.
[p.40]
Genus Rukia and Kubaryum diagnosis also in this article:Genus Micreophona Momiyama = Eophona Gould. Annot. Ornith. Orient., Vol. I, p. 319, Dec. 21, 1928. Type, by original designation: Eophona migratorie Hartert. The name is proposed for this Grosbeak because sexes are dissimilar in colour. Genus Cristemberiza Momiyama = Emberiza Linnaeus. Annot. Ornith. Orient., Vol. I, p. 319, Dec. 21, 1928. Type, by original designation: Emberiza elegans Temminck. The Yellow-throated Bunting has occipital feathers slightly longer than most members of Emberize and form a more noticeable crest. Momiyama considers it worth generic separation. Genus Sieboldornis Momiyarma = Bombycilla Vieillot. Annol. Ornith. Orient., Vol. I, p. 319, Dec. 21, 1928. Type, by original designation: Bombycivora Japonica Siebold. On account of having no “waxy” tips on the secondaries, the Japanese Waxwing is separated from the Yellow Waxwing, Bombycilla garrulus.
From https://books.google.com/books?id=Bc1FAAAAYAAJ&q="Descriptions+of+Three"&redir_esc=yAnnotationes Ornithologiae Orientalis
● Cristemberiza Momiyama 1929: 1 (3), p.319
● Micreophona Momiyama 1928: 1 (3), p.319
● Sieboldornis Momiyama 1928: 1 (3), p.319
Not seen but some information about their diagnosis.(?)
From an article mentioned here in the past. List of Birds Described by the Japanese Authors. Hachisuka
(Obviously the three names should be from the same year. Richmond and Neave both agree with Hachisuka about 1928.)Descriptions of Three New Genera and One New Species of Passerine Birds from Eastern Asia.Resembles Eophona, but strictly distinguished from it by having the striking characters as follows: the coloration of males is remarkably different from that of females. In breeding season, both sexes have semicircular, bluish white spots at the basal part of the bill.
BY
TOKU T. MOMIYAMA, M.O.S.J, M.Z.S.J, C.F.A.O.U, M.B.O.U., ETC.
Micreophona, gen. nov.
Type: Eophona migratoria migratoria = Eophona melanura migratoria HARTERT, 1903.
Cristemberiza, gen. nov.Differs from Emberiza in having a longer crest.
Type: Emberiza e. elegans = Emberiza elegans TEMMINCK, 1835.
Sieboldornis, gen. nov.Like Bombycilla, but exactly differs from it in having no “waxy” tips on the secondaries.
Type: Bombycilla japonica = Bombycivora japonica SIEBOLD, 1824.
Cyanoptila caeruleiceps MOMIYAMA, sp. nov[...]
Nope, "Alphapbetical Index to the First two volumes", is found at the end of vol 2 ... (here)The index of volume III (the only vol. of four that has an index) ...
I transcribed the Macronus text earlier - [here]. (I did not find a way into the Oreopholus text.)Illustrations of Ornithology
● Macronus Jardine & Selby 1835: series I, III (10), pl. 150, p.91.
● Oreopholus Jardine & Selby 1835: series I, III (10), pl. 151, p.93