• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

alpestris Ring Ousel (1 Viewer)

"alpestris or amicorum" is on the British List as a vagrant, but with no details of records.

Kehoe 2006 (Racial identification and assessment in Britain):
Ring Ouzel Turdus torquatus alpestris
One recent claim and four previously accepted records are currently being examined. These are currently listed as alpestris/amicorum; perhaps based on misunderstandings about the characters or relationships between the races. We believe amicorum to be an unlikely though not impossible vagrant. Separation of the races may not be as straightforward as the literature suggests, and observers familiar with nominate torquatus in worn plumage in spring or summer may be surprised by the hoary or scaly appearance of some autumn birds in fresh plumage. Detailed notes and photographs that show the body plumage, in particular the centre of the belly and the undertail-coverts, are required, although in-hand examination is highly desirable and may prove to be a prerequisite for acceptance. (Clement & Hathway 2000)

Parkin & Knox 2010 (Status of Birds in Britain & Ireland) comments: "Birds in GB from May and Sep-Oct are likely to have been alpestris or (less likely) amicorum but these require review."
 
Last edited:
All past UK records and claims of alpestris and amicorum now rejected (BOURC 40th report, 2012; Brit. Birds 108: 97-103, 2015).

I'd guess alpestris must remain a good potential candidate for the future, but amicorum a much longer shot.
 
Reading the Hasting's rarities article I thought they had been unfair to the Nicoll record. *There is one other Alpine Ring Ouzel, apart from the one in Appendix A, and
that was a female shot near Brighton, Sussex, on 29th March 1913 (Brit. Birds, 7:
117); we have no direct evidence that it was connected with the Hastings Rarities,
but as the record is similarly lacking in information, and as it was published by J. B.
Nichols for whom it provided a mate for the Hastings male already in his possession,
we think it is better discarded.
But then I read he was a friend of Meinhartzhagen and kept his skin collection in Cairo .
 
Warning! This thread is more than 8 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top