• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

400mm f/5.6 - worth it? (1 Viewer)

stevetb

Registered user
Hi,
At the moment I have a Sigma 135-400 for my 400D, and it is a great lens, pretty sharp for ~£200. But I am starting to see limitations, and I would like perhaps a bit more detail in my pictures and for them to snap into focus a bit quicker.

My question then, regards whether or not I would see a marked and noticable improvement in my pictures and the ease of getting them if I were to splash out on an EF 400 f/5.6 L. It is a lot of money for me, and I need to be able to justify it, so could i please have some opinions on this? :t:

Thanks a lot,
Steve.
Ps. this is the sort of thing I am getting atm.
 
Last edited:
Personally (having had and used both lenses) I would say that you would notice a marked improvement in both focus speed and image quality if you made the change. To my eyes the images that I get out of the 400 f5.6 are on a par with those that I get from the 500 f4 IS. I honestly think that the 400 f5.6 is the best walkabout birding lens available. Here's my favourite shot that I've taken with the 400 f5.6 - http://www.birdforum.net/gallery/showphoto.php/photo/189232/ppuser/3294
 
YES its very close to the 500 f4 just took this with my 400f5.6 L only bird around at the moment just a quick shot . ISO 400 full frame and crop
Rob
 

Attachments

  • FULL-FRAM.jpg
    FULL-FRAM.jpg
    133.9 KB · Views: 236
  • CROP.jpg
    CROP.jpg
    144.3 KB · Views: 409
Personally (having had and used both lenses) I would say that you would notice a marked improvement in both focus speed and image quality if you made the change. To my eyes the images that I get out of the 400 f5.6 are on a par with those that I get from the 500 f4 IS. I honestly think that the 400 f5.6 is the best walkabout birding lens available. Here's my favourite shot that I've taken with the 400 f5.6 - http://www.birdforum.net/gallery/showphoto.php/photo/189232/ppuser/3294
Man thats a great shot .
Rob.
 
Same for me - it's on a par with the big Canon primes but at a fraction of the cost and with the added benefit of hand holding and being light enough to carry about all day long.

For the quality it's well worth the money :t:
 
Here is one that shows the detail you can get with this lens. I took this shot yesterday while playing about with manual exposure in my garden.
It was hand held
 

Attachments

  • bbird1a.jpg
    bbird1a.jpg
    212.2 KB · Views: 375
Thanks for your input and great images! It is pretty likely I am going to go for one, if not now, I will probably end up doing so in the future.

So, does anyone have one for sale or seen one 2ndhand at a good price?

Cheers.
 
It is one of the best super telephoto lens from Canon, sharp wide open and even when used with TC, I have also tried it with stacking two 1.4TC and the IQ is still accpetable. Cheapest and affodable among the telephoto lenses.
 
Thanks for your input and great images! It is pretty likely I am going to go for one, if not now, I will probably end up doing so in the future.

So, does anyone have one for sale or seen one 2ndhand at a good price?

Cheers.

I got mine last year from Ian Kerr, he imports lenses from the USA and his prices are excellent. He charged ~£640 for the 400 f5.6 which is a good deal cheaper than UK prices and not much more than you'd pay for a secondhand one.
 
i bought mine from a e-bay shop..last year for £710..imported model from the usa.
great portable lens!...
good luck in your search ac/dc
 
I also bought mine from Ian Kerr (Kerso). Not sure of the current price but would guess around £630-£640. As Peter says he imports from the states but ships from Scotland so no extra duties or taxes to pay.
 
Hi,

Ian (Kerso) is £650 plus P+P for that lens right now but he told me it would be 10 days for stock to come in, a great price and having already bought a few lenses and a couple of flashes from Ian I can highly recommend him. All with full UK warranty.

You can email him on 2kerso@(missthisbit)gmail.com as it's best to confirm the price and stock update. I think he is in the U.S. just now so don't expect an early reply, he tends to sort through his mail at about 15:00hrs our time :t:

Mike.
 
Hi,

Ian (Kerso) is £650 plus P+P for that lens right now but he told me it would be 10 days for stock to come in, a great price and having already bought a few lenses and a couple of flashes from Ian I can highly recommend him. All with full UK warranty.

You can email him on 2kerso@(missthisbit)gmail.com as it's best to confirm the price and stock update. I think he is in the U.S. just now so don't expect an early reply, he tends to sort through his mail at about 15:00hrs our time :t:

Mike.
I've just bought a 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS from Ian (Kerso) and the price and service was excellent.
 
It's a truly great lens and I've had two excellent copies both as good. I even got some great shots a week or two back with the 2.0x at 800mm ;-)
 
Traded my Canon 400 in against Sigma 150-500 yesterday.Only take 2 handheld shots without OS so far but am happy.Will post when I sort out how to lol. Mike
 
The 400mm/5.6L lens gives the biggest bang for the buck (or shall I say, quid) It is my prime birding lens. It would have been nice to have IS though, and if Canon made one and added $300-$400 to the price, I'd say it is an unbeatable price/performance combination.

However, I find that all my shots have to be taken with a sturdy tripod.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 17 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top