stevetb
Registered user
Hi,
At the moment I have a Sigma 135-400 for my 400D, and it is a great lens, pretty sharp for ~£200. But I am starting to see limitations, and I would like perhaps a bit more detail in my pictures and for them to snap into focus a bit quicker.
My question then, regards whether or not I would see a marked and noticable improvement in my pictures and the ease of getting them if I were to splash out on an EF 400 f/5.6 L. It is a lot of money for me, and I need to be able to justify it, so could i please have some opinions on this? :t:
Thanks a lot,
Steve.
Ps. this is the sort of thing I am getting atm.
At the moment I have a Sigma 135-400 for my 400D, and it is a great lens, pretty sharp for ~£200. But I am starting to see limitations, and I would like perhaps a bit more detail in my pictures and for them to snap into focus a bit quicker.
My question then, regards whether or not I would see a marked and noticable improvement in my pictures and the ease of getting them if I were to splash out on an EF 400 f/5.6 L. It is a lot of money for me, and I need to be able to justify it, so could i please have some opinions on this? :t:
Thanks a lot,
Steve.
Ps. this is the sort of thing I am getting atm.
Last edited: