• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Apparent weird Hirundine NE England (1 Viewer)

Looks like a Ring-Necked Parakeet (Psittacula krameri). We now have well established feral populations around some europeans cities (Brussels, Paris, Montpellier, London), where they are now quite common.
Did you notice that the bird were green? Or any loud and high-pitched call?
Here's a link to somme picture, with one of the birds in flight:
http://www.living-nature.eu/?page_id=1874
 
The long tail ones look like Barn Swallows. They look to have too short a neck for parakeets.. Presumably it was the short-tailed bird the OP was asking about.
 
Those are probably three different birds, in fact.
My guess was for the one on the right, which really look like a Parakeet to me.
And I agree the one in the middle is a Barn Swallow.
But no idea for the last one on the left...
 
I think the wing bases are too wide for a Swallow. It looks a bit larky to me - but even then its too short tailed. A growing Swallow tail should show a fork and there is a lot of under tail covert/rump beyond the wing on a swallow too - just compare to the one in the photo.


It could be a Staling perhaps hard to judge size/relative height, with the bill burnt out in the photo

Though it reads as though the observer was sure it was a hirundine in the field, rather than an odd interloper found in the photo afterwards
 

Attachments

  • oddpolls.jpg
    oddpolls.jpg
    18.9 KB · Views: 122
Last edited:
It's definitely not a hirundine, the head and overall proportions look 'wrong' somehow ( unless it's an African River or White-eyed River Martin ;) ) and the 'hand' doesn't seem right for Starling.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 11 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top