He sure does (see
here, and click on Publications).
Bjorn, thank you for posting this... because the other day I was actually seeking and unable to find another article, which turns out to be Alexandre's!
A melanin-based trait is more strongly related to body size in the tropics than in temperate regions in the globally distributed barn owl family.
Roulin A., Uva V., Romano A., 2018. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 31 (12) pp. 1932-1944.
This study compared ventral spot size as a function of latitude, but my main point stems from something I'll just quote from the abstract:
"We examined predictions of this hypothesis in the Tytonidae family (barn owls and their relatives) because females, on average, display larger black spots on the tip of their ventral body feathers than males, and this trait is associated with aspects of individual quality."
Some of the SACC members were trying to make a point that plumage differences in nocturnal birds shouldn't matter. But just because we can't see in the dark doesn't mean the Barn Owls can't! I wanted this study to show that, rangewide, Barn Owls have sex-associated plumage differences and therefore, those are related to sexual selection (the basis of BSC) as per basic evolutionary concepts. In other words, if visual differences don't matter, why would males and females look different?
By extension, the different populations of Barn Owl could be said to vary much more greatly with each other in plumage than, for example, all the species of screech owls, pygmy owls, or a majority of nightjar species. One would think there could be a reason, and at the very least that it would show that there are important differences among the night birds and that easy comparisons may not be valid. The Committee seemed to realize this with regard to vocalizations, but I think it must be true with the plumage too.
Thanks again for sharing this. That volume of publications is a very impressive contribution of work from Dr. Roulin.