• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Change in rarity codes for ABA rarities (1 Viewer)

Mysticete

Well-known member
United States
http://birding.typepad.com/peeps/

after reading the Sungrebe update on the Peeps birding blog, I noticed that the post beneath it had a update on the rarity codes on the ABA checklist.

For those not familiar with the codes, they are basically ranking of how rare a bird reported in the ABA area is

1-2 are normally occurring breeding birds and visitors

3 are rare birds with annual in occurrence

4 are casual strays with 6 occurrences in the ABA area, 3 within the last 30 years.

5 are, well anything with less number of occurrences

6 are functionally extinct

ANYWAY, I am rather dissapointed with some of the changes, especially Fork-tailed Flycatcher. Green Violetear also has a similar pattern. While technically they do show up every year, there still doesn't seem to be much pattern (other than Atlantic coastal, and not even that on the Violetear!) on where they show up. Most of the code three birds you can realistically plan a strategy of attack, but not these guys. I also had my Flame-colored Tanager downgraded to code 3. Yeah, it's not difficult to get right now, but that is mostly because of one bird in Madera Canyon that shows up every summer. I wonder if this will go back to 4 after that bird and his illegitimate offspring die?

I kind of wonder if maybe the ABA should rethink some of it's rarity rating systems? But then my main target is to get all the code 3 birds in the next decade or two, so I admit I am a tad biased.... :D
 
Warning! This thread is more than 17 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top