Jon.Bryant
Well-known member
Fly from London to New York and the plane flys an arc - the shortest route loops north over the Atlantic, and is not a constant bearing.
Is anyone aware whether gps tracked birds have proven that they have the ability to fly an arc route during migration - the shortest route between breading and wintering grounds?
Just thinking about it, there are a few things that make me think it is unlikely.
1/ For birds migrating north-south there is no need - a constant bearing north-south is the shortest route. For slight variations from north south the benefit would be relatively small. For most birds I therefore think the forces of natural selection would not be strong enough to drive arc adoption.
2/ A precise arc may well cross inhospitable habitat (deserts, seas, frozen tundra, high mountains etc.). I imagine that there would probably be a benefit in migrating a more meandering route over less inhospitable habitat.
3/ The maths of flying an arc is quite complex as the bearing changes along the route, which is governed by the start and end point and has a flight length. It would seem unlikely that this calculation ability could be easily evolved in birds.
4/ Vagrancy seems at odds with the precision of arc navigation. What happens at the end of a planned arc (say started off on the wrong bearing)? - stop, continue straight, or try to extend the arc?
5/ There would seem some advantage in species that may be specialists in the breeding season, but more generalist in winter, to dispense during migration. The adoption of a precise arc may therefore be counter productive, leading to unnecessary competition on wintering grounds, when food resource may be more scarce.
I have seen some books which suggest arc routes, particularly to explain vagrancy patterns, but I think these are unconvincing arguments. It imagine that the odd apparent arc migration could in fact be a coincidental learned route. If anyone is aware of proof that birds can (and semi-regularly do) migrate along arcs, references would be appreciated.
Regards
Jon Bryant
Is anyone aware whether gps tracked birds have proven that they have the ability to fly an arc route during migration - the shortest route between breading and wintering grounds?
Just thinking about it, there are a few things that make me think it is unlikely.
1/ For birds migrating north-south there is no need - a constant bearing north-south is the shortest route. For slight variations from north south the benefit would be relatively small. For most birds I therefore think the forces of natural selection would not be strong enough to drive arc adoption.
2/ A precise arc may well cross inhospitable habitat (deserts, seas, frozen tundra, high mountains etc.). I imagine that there would probably be a benefit in migrating a more meandering route over less inhospitable habitat.
3/ The maths of flying an arc is quite complex as the bearing changes along the route, which is governed by the start and end point and has a flight length. It would seem unlikely that this calculation ability could be easily evolved in birds.
4/ Vagrancy seems at odds with the precision of arc navigation. What happens at the end of a planned arc (say started off on the wrong bearing)? - stop, continue straight, or try to extend the arc?
5/ There would seem some advantage in species that may be specialists in the breeding season, but more generalist in winter, to dispense during migration. The adoption of a precise arc may therefore be counter productive, leading to unnecessary competition on wintering grounds, when food resource may be more scarce.
I have seen some books which suggest arc routes, particularly to explain vagrancy patterns, but I think these are unconvincing arguments. It imagine that the odd apparent arc migration could in fact be a coincidental learned route. If anyone is aware of proof that birds can (and semi-regularly do) migrate along arcs, references would be appreciated.
Regards
Jon Bryant