• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Galliformes (2 Viewers)

Peter Kovalik

Well-known member
Slovakia
X.-Z. Kan, J.-K. Yang, X.-F. Li, L. Chen, Z.-P. Lei, M. Wang, C.-J. Qian, H. Gao and Z.-Y. Yang, 2010. Phylogeny of major lineages of galliform birds (Aves: Galliformes) based on complete mitochondrial genomes. Genet. Mol. Res. 9 (3): 1625-1633 (2010)
Full pdf
 
Liwei He, Bo Dai, Bo Zeng, Xiuyue Zhang, Benping Chen, Bisong Yue, Jing Li, 2009. The complete mitochondrial genome of the Sichuan Hill Partridge (Arborophila rufipectus) and a phylogenetic analysis with related species. Gene 435, 23–28.
Abstract
 
LISLEVAND, T., FIGUEROLA, J. and SZÉKELY, T. (2009), Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in grouse and allies (Aves: Phasianidae) in relation to mating competition, fecundity demands and resource division. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22: 1895–1905. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01802.x
Abstract
PDF
 
Zhaofeng Liu, Liwei He, Honggang Yuan, Bisong Yue & Jing Li, 2012. CR1 retroposons provide a new insight into the phylogeny of Phasianidae species (Aves: Galliformes). Gene, Volume 502, Issue 2, 10 July 2012, Pages 125–132.
Abstract
 
Evolution of reproductive isolation

Arrieta, Lijtmaer & Tubaro (in press). Evolution of postzygotic reproductive isolation in galliform birds: analysis of first and second hybrid generations and backcrosses. Biol J Linn Soc. [abstract]
 
Kimball & Braun

Kimball & Braun (in press). Does more sequence data improve estimates of galliform phylogeny? Analyses of a rapid radiation using a complete data matrix. PeerJ PrePrints 1: e131v1. [abstract] [pdf]
 
If this circumscription of 'Tetraonini' was a passerine group, it would have been split into three separate families in a heartbeat, and at least someone would be arguing that Bonasa probably represented a fourth family.

Agreed. This is why for my own private database, I use divergence dates (where estimates of such exist) to define boundaries of higher level taxa. An operational definition of 'a <family, subfamily, order, whatever> is whatever someone says it is' isn't much of an operational definition in my opinion.
 
"Whatever someone says it is" largely stems from Linnean ranks as being arbitrary.

Avise and colleagues actually have suggested genetic distinction as a criteria for ranking groups in a Linnean system (which isn't terribly different from divergence dating in principal), but it pretty much doesn't work between taxonomic groups. There is more genetic diversity in Fruit Flies for instance than in nearly the whole of Mammalia: either you would have to have a couple of mammal families with genera containing hundreds of species, or treat every genus of insect as something along the lines of an order or family.
 
Avise and colleagues actually have suggested genetic distinction as a criteria for ranking groups in a Linnean system (which isn't terribly different from divergence dating in principal), but it pretty much doesn't work between taxonomic groups.
Sibley & Monroe's list was an attempt to do exactly this. The result was, indeed, nothing like Phaenicophilidae: these were in family Fringillidae, which included roughly 10% of the bird species of the world.
The idea was pretty much abandoned since, I think.
 
Last edited:
Meiklejohn et al

Meiklejohn, Danielson, Faircloth, Glenn, Braun & Kimball (in press). Incongruence among different mitochondrial regions: a case study using complete mitogenomes. Mol Phylogenet Evol. [abstract]
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top