l_raty
laurent raty
I don't have anything that can open a .nex files
Which .nex file and what do you want to do with it ?
(Merely view the tree in the .nex file in the first .zip ?)
I don't have anything that can open a .nex files
Yep. Each zip files contains one .nex files. It would have been easier if they contained a .tree file(Merely view the tree in the .nex file in the first .zip ?)
Opera is a search engine? I have to install it then. How does it work afterwards?about .nex files use Opera?
There is an open access paper co-authored by Kimball:
Protein Structure, Models of Sequence Evolution, and Data Type Effects in Phylogenetic Analyses of Mitochondrial Data: A Case Study in Birds .
A paper that cites When Good Mitichondria go bad:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.8199 .
Is there a figure with divergence times?Had a slightly closer look at it -- there are actually 21 different trees in the .nex in the first zip file.
("ML_unpartitioned" and "ML_partitioned".
"Unpartitioned_GAMMA_Boot" and "Partitioned_GAMMA_Boot"
"Unpartitioned_PSR_Boot" and "Partitioned_PSR_Boot".
"BL_adjusted_CYBND2_GAMMA_unpart_Figure6".
"Ultrametric_MLunpartitioned" and "Ultrametric_BLadjusted".
"KimballTopology_BrownTaxaEquivalents", "Brown2017Topology_MatchesKimballNames" and "BrownConsensus". "
"KimballTopology_BurleighTaxaEquivalents", "BurleighTopology_MatchesKimballNames" and "BurleighConsensus".
"KimballTopology_JetzTaxaEquivalent", "JetzMajRule_Matched" and "JetzConsensus".
"KimballTopology_SteinTaxaEquivalent", "Stein_Matched" and "SteinConsensus".)
The .nex in the second zip file contains a data matrix, not trees.
Is there a figure with divergence times?
Salter, J.F., Hosner, P.A., Tsai, W.L.E., McCormack, J.E., Braun, E.L., Kimball, R.T., Brumfield, R.T., and Faircloth, B.C. (2022) Historical specimens and the limits of subspecies phylogenomics in the New World quails (Odontophoridae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, published online 5 July 2022.![]()
Historical specimens and the limits of subspecies phylogenomics in the New World quails (Odontophoridae)
As phylogenomics focuses on comprehensive taxon sampling at the species and population/subspecies levels, incorporating genomic data from historical s…www.sciencedirect.com
The impressive phenotypic diversity among odontophorids, especially in male plumage, has contributed to historical fluctuations in odontophorid taxonomy, especially at the subspecies-level (Fig. 2). However, both our ML and coalescent phylogenies using UCEs demonstrate that current taxonomy is largely consistent with the genetic relationships within and among most species of odontophorids (Fig. 3), although we did find two examples of species that were not monophyletic. All analyses (Supplementary Fig. S3) failed to recover Cyrtonyx montezumae and C. ocellatus as reciprocally monophyletic, instead suggesting these taxa form a grade from north to south. In our concatenated UCE ML tree, the three northernmost C. montezumae subspecies form one clade, sister to a clade of C. ocellatus and the two Oaxacan subspecies, C. m. rowleyi and C. m. sallei (Supplementary Fig. S1). Although the SVDquartets analysis recovered a different topology (Supplementary Fig. S2), it still did not support the reciprocal monophyly of C. montezumae and C. ocellatus, suggesting that population-level sampling and further investigation of plumage, morphology, and vocal data are needed to assess species boundaries within this genus. Based on the available evidence, our results support merging C. montezumae and C. ocellatus into C. montezumae (Vigors, 1830). Similarly, neither our ML or SVDquartets analyses resolved Odontophorus melanotis and O. erythrops as reciprocally monophyletic (Supplementary Material S3), suggesting these taxa constitute a single species (O. erythrops, Gould, 1859), consistent with previous classifications (Johnsgard, 1988). Both of these examples highlight the importance of complete taxon sampling for accurate systematic analysis of polytypic species.
Available on BiorxivSalter, J.F., Hosner, P.A., Tsai, W.L.E., McCormack, J.E., Braun, E.L., Kimball, R.T., Brumfield, R.T., and Faircloth, B.C. (2022) Historical specimens and the limits of subspecies phylogenomics in the New World quails (Odontophoridae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, published online 5 July 2022.
Redirecting
Abstract
As phylogenomics focuses on comprehensive taxon sampling at the species and population/subspecies levels, incorporating genomic data from historical specimens has become increasingly common. While historical samples can fill critical gaps in our understanding of the evolutionary history of diverse groups, they also introduce additional sources of phylogenomic uncertainty, making it difficult to discern novel evolutionary relationships from artifacts caused by sample quality issues. These problems highlight the need for improved strategies to disentangle artifactual patterns from true biological signal as historical specimens become more prevalent in phylogenomic datasets. Here, we tested the limits of historical specimen-driven phylogenomics to resolve subspecies-level relationships within a highly polytypic family, the New World quails (Odontophoridae), using thousands of ultraconserved elements (UCEs). We found that relationships at and above the species-level were well-resolved and highly supported across all analyses, with the exception of discordant relationships within the two most polytypic genera which included many historical specimens. We examined the causes of discordance and found that inferring phylogenies from subsets of taxa resolved the disagreements, suggesting that analyzing subclades can help remove artifactual causes of discordance in datasets that include historical samples. At the subspecies-level, we found well-resolved geographic structure within the two most polytypic genera, including the most polytypic species in this family, Northern Bobwhites (Colinus virginianus), demonstrating that variable sites within UCEs are capable of resolving phylogenetic structure below the species level. Our results highlight the importance of complete taxonomic sampling for resolving relationships among polytypic species, often through the inclusion of historical specimens, and we propose an integrative strategy for understanding and addressing the uncertainty that historical samples sometimes introduce to phylogenetic analyses.