• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

gulls (18 Viewers)

hi andy,

a spread tail --> usually more marked in LBBG, a spread wing --> stronger venetian blind in YLG would have been helpful. weak bill doesn't say anything because young michahellis can be quite slim billled. both are very similar in th rest of plumage, and variable...could well be a LBBG.
 
The three together, you´ll see which is which:

http://waarneming.nl/foto/view/200668

Juv YLG and LBBG at this time can be difficult to separate in a view like the one of Andrews. Wear or any moult in scapular or coverts might help - altough some LBBG are similar in this respect, so maybe wear indicate better differences. In Andrews gull some wear is detectable in one upper scapulars in the far wing but probably not signific enoug to secure identification.

Note paler YLG here, with LBBG showing not fully grown primaries:

http://www.gull-research.org/ylg1cy2cy/1cyjuly/mich2256.htm

Selection of juv LBBG here:

http://waarneming.nl/soort/photos/1...2010-07-13&os=0&os=1&sex=&id_kleed=5&id_akt=0

YLG here:

http://waarneming.nl/soort/photos/2...2010-07-13&os=0&os=1&sex=&id_kleed=5&id_akt=0

Herring + YLG:

http://www.elisanet.fi/hj.koskinen/JuvHGs_YLGs2008.html

Not forgetting this:

http://www.helsinki.fi/~rauste/juvmic/index.html

JanJ
 
Last edited:


Fantastic selection of links as always. Very much appreciated!

I will work through the links later tonight I have however removed the photo from the website for now.

Thanks again to all,

Andy.
 
Last edited:
hi andy,

a spread tail --> usually more marked in LBBG, a spread wing --> stronger venetian blind in YLG would have been helpful. weak bill doesn't say anything because young michahellis can be quite slim billled. both are very similar in th rest of plumage, and variable...could well be a LBBG.

Thanks Lou. Very hard. I'll have to 'let this one go', I think.

The differences between LBBG and YLG can be quite subtle.

LBBG:

http://www.gull-research.org/ijmuiden/photos/406254.jpg

http://www.gull-research.org/lbbg1cy/images1cy/4259rb16.jpg

YLG:

http://www.gull-research.org/ylg1cy2cy/images/mich1cyjul/1895mich1cy.jpg

In general, LBBG seems to often have a gingery tone to the juvenile feather fringes whereas YLG seem whiter (as with my bird?). My bird also has a leggy feel to it.

I'll get back down to the recycling centre on Sunday and see if I can find some more juvs.

Cheers,

Andy.

Edit: Just been sent this. Tail is typical but not the inner primaries?

http://www.portlandbirdobs.org.uk/aa_latestnews.htm
 
Last edited:
Edit: Just been sent this. Tail is typical but not the inner primaries?

http://www.portlandbirdobs.org.uk/aa_latestnews.htm

it has a paler belly than typical graellsii but - seriously, i'm suspicious if such a tail band isn't within variation of LBBG? baltic gulls at least can show such narrow tail bands: http://www.israel.gull-research.org/fuscus1cy/ht241121.html

and attached from 21.10.2009 sanpaul, RO, joszef szabo.

2nd pic: how i'd expect in a mich (black sea, 29.7.2006 cosmin manci) a venetian blind.

and colour tone of upperparts looks very cold. no really visible vanetian blind, i'd expect more in a mich.
nice juv herring gull beneath the portland bird.
 

Attachments

  • Lar9518 - Kopie.jpg
    Lar9518 - Kopie.jpg
    269.2 KB · Views: 66
  • 7 2006.07.29 mangalia c.o.manci 4942.jpg
    7 2006.07.29 mangalia c.o.manci 4942.jpg
    28.4 KB · Views: 68
Last edited:
it has a paler belly than typical graellsii but - seriously, i'm suspicious if such a tail band isn't within variation of LBBG? baltic gulls at least can show such narrow tail bands: http://www.israel.gull-research.org/fuscus1cy/ht241121.html

and attached from 21.10.2009 sanpaul, RO, joszef szabo.

2nd pic: how i'd expect in a mich (black sea, 29.7.2006 cosmin manci) a venetian blind.

and colour tone of upperparts looks very cold. no really visible vanetian blind, i'd expect more in a mich.
nice juv herring gull beneath the portland bird.

Thanks Lou. You make some very good points there.
 
Hi,

A different juvenile present today. Please see attached.

IMHO, a juvenile YLG. In flight this bird had an obvious veventian blind and a restricted tail band on an ostensibly white tail and rump.

What do you think please?

Cheers,

Andy.
 

Attachments

  • juv and ad ylgs.JPG
    juv and ad ylgs.JPG
    58.3 KB · Views: 69
  • juv plus gulls.JPG
    juv plus gulls.JPG
    59.7 KB · Views: 64
  • ylg.jpg
    ylg.jpg
    114.2 KB · Views: 49
Birdguides:

18/07 15:08 LONDON, GREATER : Yellow-legged Gull, Crayford [A]two (adult and juvenile) at the recycling centre

Well, someone agrees with the ID! I only posted these shots here so someone from Birdguides, RBA or East London must have seen these images. Also, well done to them for spotting the adult that was craftily kept in the first two cropped images.

For completeness, there were two other adults present too so four birds in total.

Also, as bizarre as this may sound, when the birds are on the recycling centre roof, they are in London. If they fly 30 yards to one of the mounds of rubbish, they are in Kent. Probably best to report them as 'Kent/London'. Furthermore, if they fly to the flooded fields, they are also in Kent. To confuse matters, either Multimap or Google show the whole site as being in Kent wheareas Ordnance survey maps show the boundary passing through the site.

Cheers,

Andy.
 
Last edited:
Hello!

Just wanted to post here a few pics of gulls from the Danube delta (this May). Confusingly the guide told me that all gulls there are YLG, but on my pics most are Caspians as I understand (correct me if I'm wrong) except for IMG_2098 and IMG_2117.
2073/2074 I am not that sure about (they are from Bucharest)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2008.jpg
    IMG_2008.jpg
    334.1 KB · Views: 54
  • IMG_2019.jpg
    IMG_2019.jpg
    205.8 KB · Views: 63
  • IMG_2073.jpg
    IMG_2073.jpg
    232.3 KB · Views: 54
  • IMG_2074.jpg
    IMG_2074.jpg
    279.6 KB · Views: 53
  • IMG_2098.jpg
    IMG_2098.jpg
    203 KB · Views: 56
Last edited:
+ some more
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2111.jpg
    IMG_2111.jpg
    205.8 KB · Views: 55
  • IMG_2112.jpg
    IMG_2112.jpg
    163.7 KB · Views: 55
  • IMG_2117.jpg
    IMG_2117.jpg
    392.1 KB · Views: 61
  • IMG_2119.jpg
    IMG_2119.jpg
    352.4 KB · Views: 64
  • IMG_3120.jpg
    IMG_3120.jpg
    250.9 KB · Views: 54
most are Caspians as I understand (correct me if I'm wrong) except for IMG_2098 and IMG_2117.

I think you've identified most of them correctly. The immature could be a YLG (too early for a pale iris for Caspian?). Nice selection of images too.

Cheers,

Andy.
 
Last edited:
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top