Hi chaps,
I had a juv michahellis at the local recycling centre yesterday.
If you could just confirm the ID, that would be appreciated. Please view the attached link.
http://www.kentos.org.uk/recentsigntings/july10NWKent.htm
Cheers,
Andy.
Hi chaps,
I had a juv michahellis at the local recycling centre yesterday.
If you could just confirm the ID, that would be appreciated. Please view the attached link.
http://www.kentos.org.uk/recentsigntings/july10NWKent.htm
Cheers,
Andy.
I´d like to see that tail better Andy
JanJ
Recent arrivals of juv. YLG and Caspian Gull here, compare:
http://www.artportalen.se/birds/gallery_imageinfo.asp?imageID=228073
http://www.artportalen.se/birds/gallery_imageinfo.asp?imageID=228070
http://www.artportalen.se/birds/gallery_imageinfo.asp?imageID=228067
http://www.artportalen.se/birds/gallery_imageinfo.asp?imageID=228063
JanJ
hi andy,
a spread tail --> usually more marked in LBBG, a spread wing --> stronger venetian blind in YLG would have been helpful. weak bill doesn't say anything because young michahellis can be quite slim billled. both are very similar in th rest of plumage, and variable...could well be a LBBG.
Edit: Just been sent this. Tail is typical but not the inner primaries?
http://www.portlandbirdobs.org.uk/aa_latestnews.htm
it has a paler belly than typical graellsii but - seriously, i'm suspicious if such a tail band isn't within variation of LBBG? baltic gulls at least can show such narrow tail bands: http://www.israel.gull-research.org/fuscus1cy/ht241121.html
and attached from 21.10.2009 sanpaul, RO, joszef szabo.
2nd pic: how i'd expect in a mich (black sea, 29.7.2006 cosmin manci) a venetian blind.
and colour tone of upperparts looks very cold. no really visible vanetian blind, i'd expect more in a mich.
nice juv herring gull beneath the portland bird.
Thanks Lou. You make some very good points there.
most are Caspians as I understand (correct me if I'm wrong) except for IMG_2098 and IMG_2117.