• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Hawk ID from Commercial. (1 Viewer)

MLoyko

d[-_-]b
Sorry if this is kinda off topic-ish but I remember this commercial from the Holidays. I was in a local grocery store today with a friend picking up his paycheck and I saw bottles of the soda sitting there and it reminded me of the commercial so I looked it up.

Anybody know what species of hawk is used in the commercial? Or was it just generated for the commercial maybe?

Here is the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkDN-TD3yn8&feature=related

Again sorry for being totally out there...was debating about putting it up.

Thanks,
Matt
 
It's not a White-tailed Hawk is it?

Hi Matt,

It bears a strong resemblance to one in terms of both structure and plumage. However, the head pattern seems a bit off. I am not sure what other possibilities there might be globally, but if the bird is a hawk native to the U.S., I do not think there are any other possibilities.

Best,
Jim
 
I've found that they tend to / are not allowed to use American species in our commercials - Hooded Crows in that Windex commercial? And some species of Eurasiafican vulture in some wireless internet commercial.
 
I've found that they tend to / are not allowed to use American species in our commercials - Hooded Crows in that Windex commercial? And some species of Eurasiafican vulture in some wireless internet commercial.

I remember that Windex commercial. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqKS-hkhhh4

That kinda has a double meaning if you think about it, a reverse of rolls..instead of the bird smacking into the window (which is a big problem) the human is smacking into the window.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 16 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top