Robert Moore
Well-known member
Sorry, I know this thread is about the 7x21 so I will shut up now. Lol
Same with the NL 10x42. Perfect color rendition and a huge FOV that is sharp right to the edge. I think they are pretty hard to beat. I have the NL 8x32, and it is very good, but that NL 10x42 blew me away. I am glad I got the NL 10x42 instead of the NL 10x32. I think it would be more finicky for eye placement and not as bright with the smaller exit pupil. I still think the Curio 7x21 is the best pocket, I just don't know if I will use a pocket that much. I am thinking about keeping it.The 12x42 has pretty much spoiled me.
The colors are perfect and the blacks are pure black with no smearing like on woodpecker where black meets white. Zero CA and perfect color rendition is something special in this bino and you really notice it when going back and forth between other binoculars.
What do you mean by "boosted"? Forgive my ignorance if this should be obvious to me.I had two 10x42 NL and both I found out when star testing them had coma so I returned them. It’s weird that I had two that did this. They were terrible when i boosted them using my 8x binoculars as a booster so I knew I could never be satisfied with them. The 12 NL has nice concentric star pattern when boosted.
I own the NL Pure 8x32. In broad daylight, I found the Curio to be very close except for the wide FOV.I own a pair of Swarovski nl pure 10x32 and am blown away by their quality and performance, how close to these in sharpness and clarity are the Curios. I feel a small size take anywhere set would compliment my nl pure.
It sounds ideal, with the caveat that you're pairing a model with the widest available AFOV (~70°) with a pocket bin of only ~50°. That's an enormous contrast. Will it keep you from enjoying the Curio?I feel a small size take anywhere set would compliment my nl pure.
The Two Mikes,Mike,
For "truly pocketable", yes it's the Curio over the VP. With either, I'm still always always surprised by the quality of the image to size ratio. The Terra are similar in size to the VP and both are much larger than the Curio. See pics below, sorry about the quality.
Mike
Sorry, missed this, I had the same question.I read good thing about the Curio. How are the eyecups? Narrower than the eyecups of for instance the CL 8x25? I read comments that the 8x25's aren't real pocket bins, but isnt it true that the viewing comfort of a bit bigger bins with wider eyecups and a bit more weight is better?
So in case your pockets are big enough, the CL 8x25 would be the one to pick? The AFOV and the exit pupil a a little bigger too. A 7 power has more DOV. That would be nice af course.
But for me: I have big pockets, I do not care about a bit more weight, I liker higher magnifications, I do care about viewing comfort. I even read that the viewing comfort of the Terra 8x25 is a bit better compared with the CL 8x25, because they have a bit more volume. That's what counts for me as well.
I know, it's all about personal reference. But what about the viewing comfort? Isn't the Curio too little in that respect, if weight and size doesn't matter that much?
The Two Mikes,
What about eye/face fit? The Curio is smaller but so is the diameter of the eyecups. How do you keep the EPs steady against your face?
Brock
Unfortunately, it is no longer available in the market. Olympus 8x21 DCP, which is identical to this one, except for the magnification, was my first real bino and I was totally satisfied with it. It was the perfect bino I ever had and I am not even satisfied with NL 8x42 compared to that little cutiee. However, this is only my personal experience 😀😀
Very strange and surprising !Olympus 8x21 DCP was the perfect bino I ever had and I am not even satisfied with NL 8x42 compared to
Thank you for the info @Gijs van Ginkel. I really enjoyed the 8x21 DCP version 10-12 years ago. Actually, the fact that it was my first real bino might have made a big positive impression on me. That positive impression I had mainly because of the good viewing and handling comfort it offered to me. I think due to my face shape short eye-relief binoculars give the best viewing comfort. Currently, I get the best viewing comfort with UV HD 10x32 which has low eye relief for most of the people. I will buy one more pair of 8x21 which is still available in the market around 50 euros to see whether it would still amuses me 😀Viraj, post 96,
We have investigated the Olumpus 7x21 together with a number of other compact binoculars (see the WEB-site of House of Outdoor) and I was not very impressed by it because of its short eyerelief of 8 mm . Advantage was, however, its FOV of 131m/1000m. With transmission values of 80-84% and good color reproduction it is for its price an acceptable binocular.
Gijs van Ginkel
When I first joined here I never thought I'd be saying that my 10x32 HD+ was one of my favorite binoculars. Makes a nice pairing with the Curio too.Currently, I get the best viewing comfort with UV HD 10x32 which has low eye relief for most of the people.