• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Latest IOC Diary Updates (4 Viewers)

The Clements update also splits Gray-browed Wren
'Mantaro Wren' is there (seperately) listed as undescribed
This is probably the best approach until genetic data become available.

At present vocalizations and morphology point in different directions:
  • vocally it is very different from schulenbergi and quite similar to Inca Wren (see my note)
  • morphologically it is 'plain-tailed'
 
Jul 5 Post lump of Buff-chested Babbler with Rufous-fronted Babbler.

To quote that 60's hit 'there's a whole lotta a lumpin goin on'.
 
Probably can look at that Clements update to get a sense of what else is coming down the pipeline soon. The Redpoll lump is on that list and that one is going to hit probably near everyone here I would guess.
 
I'd be surprised if some recent splits don't get re-lumped, we've already seen it with IIRC, Shrike Babblers, Drongos and Lesser Whitethoats.

Some of the East/West or North/South splits might be particularly, vulnerable to re-lumping IMHO, Northern Mealy Amazon with Southern Mealy Amazon being just one, recent example.

I could imagine East/West splits in Africa being particularly vulnerable, slightly less so, (Sahara) North/South.

Some seabird activity might also be expected?
 
Last edited:
So the logic should be that either all three get lumped or that if only one of them, then it has to be ambiguum and ruficeps?

Am I understanding that correctly?
No, no lump, for me in any case. Ambiguum is probably a valid species according to recent studies
 
Last edited:
Jul 5 Post re-lump of Sulawesi and Seram Swiftlets with Halmahera (Moluccan) Swiftlet.

This is the geographical zone that was foremost in my mind in post #2755
 
Last edited:
So the logic should be that either all three get lumped or that if only one of them, then it has to be ambiguum and ruficeps?

Am I understanding that correctly?

In published trees, rufifrons was actually basal to ([ambiguum, ruficeps], pyrrhops).

(Cai et al 2018 analyzed two data sets -- one which was the entire supermatrix they had built, and which had all 4 spp of this group; the other in which they had removed some taxa that they regarded as rogue, including rufifrons. Without rufifrons, they recovered a topology ([ambiguum, ruficeps], pyrrhops) which was very strongly supported (internal node with MLBS = 100); with rufifrons, the support to all the internal nodes in the group was low (MLBS = 69; BPP ≃ 0.7). To me, this suggests a problem with the data.)
 
Last edited:
A subspecies re-arrangement that I think has affected my list and might be of interest to others:

Collared Scops OwlOtus lettiaAdd subspecies cnephaeus.ADDSubspecies cnephaeus, previously synonymized with the nominate subspecies of Otus lempiji, is reassigned to Otus lettia based on vocalizations (Wu & Rheindt 2023).

I presume cnephaeus covers at least everything on the Thai-Malay peninsula?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top