Jha et al 2021 recovered this species as the sister group of a clade made of
Hemixos,
Hypsipetes and
Ixos.
(To be frank, this looks like a wholly unnecessarily disruptive move to me. The species was described in
Ixos in 1836, but had not been placed in this genus for ages. Up to now, searching on two different combinations (
Pycnonotus,
Hemixos) was necessary to find modern data relating to it -- from now on, three will be needed. For what gain ? If a "place holder" was needed, why not use one of the two genera in which it had been recently placed ?)