• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Latest IOC Diary Updates (19 Viewers)

I would love a copy of the list.

I am skeptical however that Avibase necessarily is reliable for this information at this phase. It just seems weird that they would provide an early preview of changes in this manner.

Denis LaPage is part of the team building the database. The tools he has built for Avibase seem a good base for the new WGAC system, so I'm not surprised that the preliminary WGAC lists are already on Avibase. The surprise is they are public


As of 10 June 2022, the WGAC Bibliographic group has:
  • Assembled a team and developed a process to assess Bibliographic discrepancies and to ensure accurate bibliographic data for all taxa in the WGAC taxonomy. The team has worked with Denis Lepage to develop a database tool to make changes to key bibliographic fields in a process that is integrated with the taxonomic work.
  • Completely reviewed the author names and publication names and adopted standards for those.
  • The team is in the process of reviewing the full citation (author, year, and publication) for all taxa on the WGAC list.
  • Over time, the team will assess more specific information including protonym, type locality, and more.
Under the direction of Marshall Iliff, eBird project leader, the technical infrastructure, database, and linkages to external digital resources will be coordinated at the Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, one of the foremost interfaces between ornithological science and the broader ornithological community in the world. The database will be built in collaboration with Denis Lepage, creator of Avibase, and firmly rooted in the adoption of taxonomic concepts. Taxonomic concepts, an organizational structure for taxonomies that already has been applied by Avibase across all major checklists, will not only allow us to better understand differences among existing lists, but also will be used to track future taxon changes over time and ensure that external data resources are accurately linked. Avibase already acts as a repository for much of the information WGAC hopes to maintain and will continue to play a key role in the maintenance of the new global list.

The final checklist will produce more than just a hierarchical list of species and recommended names. It will provide, through its detailed fields and connections to external references, the basic information for all ornithology – professional ornithologists, citizen scientists, conservationists and students – to draw on the full record of diversity of earth’s birdlife.
 
No, not yet, in a list format. However, WGAC:s position is noted in Avibase for every taxon. That’s why I compiled a list of my own. See here for instance on previously mentioned rufula (scroll way down): Cecropis rufula (Lesser Striated Swallow (rufula)) - Avibase
I read it as a three way split of Red-rumped creating

Eastern Red-rumped Swallow,
European Rd-rumped Swalllow
African Red-rumped Swallow

Sri Lankan, shouldn't be involved as I read it and it shouldn't be that hard, working them out?
It seems there is a "Working Group Avian Checklists" line in almost all my avibase records (only < 1% lack it; it will probably still change somewhat in the coming months ).
 
Last edited:
If we have European and African Red-rumped Swallows, then shouldn’t Eastern be Asian Red-rumped Swallow?

Dave
And given that "European" breeds in North Africa and as far east as Pakistan and (correct me if I'm wrong) if is also the taxon that breeds in Central Asia, Iran and Arabia, then "Western" might be a better name than "European".
 
And given that "European" breeds in North Africa and as far east as Pakistan and (correct me if I'm wrong) if is also the taxon that breeds in Central Asia, Iran and Arabia, then "Western" might be a better name than "European".
Indeed, range for rufula which I presume, is the one we see in the UK (?) is given as 's Europe and n Africa e to Iran, Pakistan and nw India > to Africa and sw Asia' but you have to call it something?
 
And given that "European" breeds in North Africa and as far east as Pakistan and (correct me if I'm wrong) if is also the taxon that breeds in Central Asia, Iran and Arabia, then "Western" might be a better name than "European".
Yes, we are discussing that very issue.
 
I read it as a three way split of Red-rumped creating

Eastern Red-rumped Swallow,
European Rd-rumped Swalllow
African Red-rumped Swallow

Sri Lankan, shouldn't be involved as I read it and it shouldn't be that hard, working them out?
thanks, that was what I thought.

The main problem with assigning records to the new taxa is birds seen in Africa in winter.

Ian
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top