• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

New to Astrophotography (3 Viewers)

Hi Jason,

Thanks a lot for the tips. For the issue of underexposure, I guess its my monitor that's not calibrated. I'll keep in mind to boost up the ISO and experiment it in the field again. Its always a challenge to shoot in harsh lighting to get proper exposure on one side and preventing burnt out on the others.

I have decided to keep the barlow as I'll be incurring shipping cost twice to ship to & fro from US and me.

tbc
 
How far away was the bird? A 2X converter results in half the depth of field and depth of field gets less the closer something is. I suppose the rule of thumb would be if using 2X then don't photograph anything too close. As a guide, at about 20m I can get all of a Pigeon in focus with the barlow.

The 2X Kenko should be fairly versatile because you can put a cheap macro tube between the camera and teleconverter to alter its magnification. Something like a 35mm macro tube would take it to around 3X for example.

Paul.

Hi Paul,

The subject is about 30 meters away. I am contemplating a cheap macro tube soon. The current set-up with the barlow has totally offset the balance on the tripod and the clampshell is already at the maximum position. Its either a longer base plate or something else which I will figure out later.

tbc
 
Some recent shots. Feel free to comment.

tbc
 

Attachments

  • Heron.jpg
    Heron.jpg
    78.7 KB · Views: 102
  • Lapwing.jpg
    Lapwing.jpg
    91.1 KB · Views: 95
  • Moorhen.jpg
    Moorhen.jpg
    139.2 KB · Views: 81
  • Spotted Wood Owl (Juv).jpg
    Spotted Wood Owl (Juv).jpg
    240.6 KB · Views: 103
They are all sharp and in focus which is good. The last one has some processing artifacts, any chance you could post the original without any processing at all?

Were any taken with the new barlow?

Paul.
 
Exposures look good on all of them, nice work, TBC. The first image is fantastic. I agree with Paul regarding the processed look of the last one (otherwise a nicely composed shot).
 
Paul,

The Heron, lapwing and Common Moorhen was taken with the new Antares barlow but not the owl which is too close. (Reattached saved from RAW to jpeg & resized only)

See Buffy Fish Owl on 600mm as low light and slow shutter is killing the shots. (Shutter speed : 1/2 Sec, ISO : 1600, Raw, Saved from RAW to jpeg & resized only)

tbc
 

Attachments

  • Spotted Wood Owl (Juv).jpg
    Spotted Wood Owl (Juv).jpg
    128.3 KB · Views: 89
  • Buffy Fish Owl.jpg
    Buffy Fish Owl.jpg
    63.8 KB · Views: 95
Good stuff.

The reposted image has come out much better with the simple conversion from RAW to jpeg. The owl in the dark is good too.

Paul.
 
Shots taken last Sat.

Paul,
I felt the Antares 1.6X is not giving me the sharpness I want, even after re-focussing, the shots turn up below expectations. These shots were taken either prime of with Kenko 1.4TC.
 

Attachments

  • $ bird.jpg
    $ bird.jpg
    63.2 KB · Views: 80
  • Tanibar Corella.jpg
    Tanibar Corella.jpg
    35.2 KB · Views: 78
  • Tern.jpg
    Tern.jpg
    26.1 KB · Views: 81
Due to the high magnification with the Antares 1.6X you need to use mirror lock up and a shutter release pretty much all the time. Air quality also needs to be very clear with no heat effects like quivering/shimmering air currents. Use a high enough ISO like 800 to get the highest shutter speed. Going by my tests, if all those things are adhered to then it's the sharpest thing around in that price bracket.

Paul.
 
Last edited:
Due to the high magnification with the Antares 1.6X you need to use mirror lock up and a shutter release pretty much all the time. Air quality also needs to be very clear with no heat effects like quivering/shimmering air currents. Use a high enough ISO like 800 to get the highest shutter speed. Going by my tests, if all those things are adhered to then it's the sharpest thing around in that price bracket.

Paul.

Paul,

Would it be better to test indoors where the elements are pretty much more predictable / controllable? Would'nt using lock up means framing using live view?

tbc
 
On the Canon cameras you can use mirror lock up without using liveview. You go into custom menus and select mirror lock up. Then use it with the 2 second timer. When you press the shutter remote it first locks up the mirror and then the 2 second timer starts and then it takes the photo. The 2 second timer is selected so that any vibrations from the mirror lock up have time to dampen. My old Pentax dslr had the same functions.

From what I read on the web you can do the same thing with your Nikon.

Paul.
 
Paul,

Would it be better to test indoors where the elements are pretty much more predictable / controllable?

tbc

I do all my tests in the shade and at only 7m range so there wouldn't be much influence from contributing factors. Plus I take loads of photos, refocus each one with 10X liveview and only keep the sharpest.

Paul.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 14 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top