• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

nightjars in the kruger i.d help please (1 Viewer)

hi, 3 nightjars remain unidentified. if anyone has any opinions i'd very much appreciate. they were taken on the 20th of november in the kruger
 

Attachments

  • 743%20(Large).JPG
    743%20(Large).JPG
    85.2 KB · Views: 53
  • 749%20(Large).JPG
    749%20(Large).JPG
    148.1 KB · Views: 55
  • 758%20(Large).JPG
    758%20(Large).JPG
    138.3 KB · Views: 44
I'd suggest Mozambique Nightjar Caprimulgus fossii, I'll check refs later, its been a while.

Edit: Refs look good in Cleere but I see BBB has suggested otherwise...
Should add that Mozambique aka Square-tailed
 
Last edited:
Hi Mark, Adam,

Personally, when it comes to ID silent Caprimulgus on the ground, I find that nightmares is better suited than nightjars...;)

Generally the first clue is provided by the habitat, because when a bird is in a position that doesn't show any critical feature for ID (tail or secondaries edging, primary pattern, etc...) a positive ID is generally hardly reachable. And especially so in this case, as the most likely species (Mozambique, Rufous-cheeked and Fiery-necked) are very close regarding upperparts pattern...

I think a precise location and a description of the habitat could help, for example Rufous-cheeked is quite localised in the Kruger and mostly absent from the Southern part of the park...and honestly I think there is no way the first bird can be IDed with this single image.
 
Interesting Tib's.

I initially put Fiery-necked or fossii as my initial choice and then ruled it out on editing due to the strength of the covert bar, surely most prominent in fossii?
I didn't consider Rufous-cheeked, but having a quick look at refs, they can also show a strong bar in the south it seems - http://www.pbase.com/dubisha/image/137236310

Nightmares, I'll remember that
 
I didn't consider Rufous-cheeked, but having a quick look at refs, they can also show a strong bar in the south it seems - http://www.pbase.com/dubisha/image/137236310

That's actually a fossii Mark...and this bird perfectly illustrates the point I wanted to make about the upperparts, this bird looks quite different to a standard fossii and the upperparts pattern is somewhat reminiscent of Swamp nightjar (to my eyes at least). Likewise, I have pictures of a breeding male Standard-winged nightjar (so no ID troubles there ;) ) that is unbelievably dark, much darker than any SWN I have seen. It's frustrating, but in my opinion, many nightjars are best left unIDed unless you're able to see some diagnostic features like primary and tail pattern.

I have little experience of Rufous-cheeked, most birds of this species I have been able to ID where seen in the Kalahari. After comparing a few pictures, it looks like the bar formed by the lesser coverts is indeed weaker than in fossii but what about Fiery-necked?

I don't have a copy of Cleere's yet, any review of the book available?

Edit: I have attached the photo of that dark SWN.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1529.jpg
    IMG_1529.jpg
    161.4 KB · Views: 36
Last edited:
the birds were all seen around punda maria in the far north of kruger. we had fiery-necked, pennant-winged and square-tailed in the evening but these birds didnt play ball and fly around in front of the lights for us.
 
one of our guides in the cape sent the photos to a nightjar specialist who replied " although the shots arent very good they seem to have buff coloured collars and the colour doesnt seem to extend down onto the breast which would make them rufous-cheeked". thanks to everyone for your opinions and help
 
I confess I rarely attempt to identify nightjars on visuals alone. All my positive ID's have been based on calls. A calling bird is easy, since most calls are readily identifiable.
Dave
 
Warning! This thread is more than 12 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top