tehri
Well-known member

When are you selling them and are they the best birding binoculars in the world?Buy a pair of these Zeiss 8x42 FL's, and you won't have any problems with cracked armor. These are over 15 years old and have seen considerable use. They only weigh 26 oz. and have better CA control than any NL, EL, SF or Noctivid.
NONBIODEGRADABLE View attachment 1519028
Not quite. I would not put so much faith in them.If it fails I know Swarovksi will replace it and most likely with a new combination of armor and adhesive that lasts longer. Of course they'll address this as soon as they can.
I have had the FL 8x32, but I preferred the FL 8x42 for the brighter view in low light with the AK prisms and bigger EP. The FL 8x32 is nice and compact, but they get a fortune for them even on the used market. They are still very popular.
When are you selling them and are they the best birding binoculars in the world?
Respectfully, could we please keep the discussion on topic to the Swarovski armour and not other alternatives, e.g. FL?I think Iโm done following all your inconsistencies until you become more consistent. Some might say that youโre very consistent in your inconsistencies. Your giving me a headache.
Thanks for sharing. I mentioned to Swarovski management that the issue seems to be appearing on NLs too as they hit the 2-3 year mark (which is when my ELs started to deteriorate).Same Problem with the Coating on my 2 1/2 year old NL 8x42. The Rubber gets sticky and began to tear.
Have also a Problem with the Fokkus. Comes over time a gap in the wheel. Now when I fokkus from infinity to 30 meters, the left and right channel runs not parallel. Have to fokkus up and down, than it works. In higher temperatures it works better than in colder.
Donโt like to send it to Swarovski because the repair Time is to longe at the moment. And like to wait for a better coating in the future I hope. Think to send it in now the Bino comes back with a new but same crap coating than now.
Optical one of my favorite Bino, but the quality compared to my older and newer Zeiss is a Joke.
Me neither, very far from it !!!!! ๐กNot quite. I would not put so much faith in them.
Probably pretty dry with lots of that smoke ๐งโ๐ผTwo friends here in Ontario have suffered the same, pretty moderate climate in terms of humidity etc.
We probably won't come to that, (unfortunately), but for me and without a doubt, it could lead to a class-action lawsuit against Swarovski.
There is a lie here, a complete silence to buyers, customers, regarding this issue.
For many, the purchase of such an instrument at this price is a sacrifice, a dilemma, an important choice, and never the strong possibility that it deteriorates is mentioned by any seller, nor by the manufacturer.
I know, I know... but deteriorating is enough of a problem on its own, not to mention the binoculars disappearing for 4 months !No chance when they're fixing it for free.
I know, I know... but deteriorating is enough of a problem on its own, not to mention the binoculars disappearing for 4 months !
All these are really hidden contingencies totally unworthy of the price paid, which could be enough for a class-action lawsuit..
They're fixing it for free ?... of course they're !!!... But not quite since the shipment is the responsibility of the customer !!!!!!
For those affected they seem to be working on a long term solution, and in the mean time replacing for free. even if out of warranty, I'm not sure what else you can reasonbly expect a company to do. Turnaround on repairs hasn't been 4 months for a while - recent reports suggest around 4-6 weeks. There is no way a class action would succeed.
For what it's worth, our binos have been stored in a humidity-controlled dry cabinet at 45% RH when not in use, i.e. 90% of the timeI was told that this issue is mainly happening in high humidity conditions and it is due to a compound used in the armor. He would not confirm nor deny if in addition to the compound weakness in very humid conditions if there was also a bad run.
According to my source at Swarovski today , this biodegradable material began being used when the SV version was introduced around 2010. As others have mentioned in the thread, my source has confirmed they are working on improving the current armor, not changing it altogether. I was told that this issue is mainly happening in high humidity conditions and it is due to a compound used in the armor. He would not confirm nor deny if in addition to the compound weakness in very humid conditions if there was also a bad run.
Id like to know if others using their bins in more moderate climate conditions have had or are having these issues. He did mention the name of compound/culprit , I forget at the moment , I think someone else had mentioned it. This is not going to be remedied anytime soon , like within months. Their outlook on this is that they are very concerned with their consumers and want to get it right, not a quick fix. Probably gonna take a few years, but thatโs my guess. He did mention that they are repairing this issue free of charge even if out of warranty. Thatโs at least reassuring to me, considering the investment I have in my Swaro collection.
Paul
Thats completely disgraceful for bins at this price point.These are mine, the peeling of the armour accelerated recently after the material became tacky and brittle. This is after only 2+ years of light use.
My much cheaper Vortex binoculars (which are not known for great built quality) have been totally fine in this regard, not even a scuff mark.