I'm not familiar with lesser but understood the bill to be too gracile, the underwing pattern too "patchy" for grey-headed? Those grey-headed fish-eagle I've seen would have a more distinct brown wash to the breast. But happy to be wrong...I'd take it to be grey-headed fish-eagle (distinct, not diffuse, black terminal tail-band), presumably sub-adult.
Well could be. I think I'm seeing something like this [assuming it's correctly id'd]:Pretty bad angle for judging the bill.
I don't think there's anything patchy about the underwing that moult and misplaced feathers don't account for? Other than that, I'd call it pretty uniform.
Tail-pattern seems to be the killer feature.
Bird on your link does indeed seem to match the OP's bird. My guess from the f/guides is that that Macaulay pic is misidentified but I've no way of demonstrating that.I think I'm seeing something like this [assuming it's correctly id'd]:
https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/1...68.516187097.1617631679-1465016617.1534520986
Well I was curious to see if I could make any more of this so I read the sections in raptors of the world and started to look at wing profiles more closely. Raptors says for grey-headed "wings similar but in proportion wings relatively slightly shorter and tail longer; wing span 2.2x length".Bird on your link does indeed seem to match the OP's bird. My guess from the f/guides is that that Macaulay pic is misidentified but I've no way of demonstrating that.
This bird
http://orientalbirdimages.org/search.php?Bird_Image_ID=17784&Bird_ID=868 (if correctly identified) suggests that the OP's bird's tail is wrong for lesser fish-eagle - but I can't find any grey-headed in the OBC dbase with a tail to match the OP's bird's (these two spp perch conspicuously so seem mostly to be photographed that way, sadly!).
It's difficult to see how lesser could go through a plumage-progression from pale-mushy-tailed juvenile to dark-mushy-tailed adult while passing through a plumage that has a crisp black terminal tail-band (the OP's bird). But what do I know
I've always found this pair awkward to separate when not showing obvious features.
I can't see how this could explain the OP's bird. As I said, it would mean having a crisp distinct black terminal band as an intermediate stage between a mushy pale darker-ended tail (juv/imm) and a mushy dark darker-ended tail (adult) - which would be altogether weird. Anyway - beyond me: it needs somebody with bags of field experience and/or a handy skin-collection to sort it out...[Tail-pattern is] due to retention of immature's tail banding. If this is faded tail can appear white
NielsAdult Lesser Fish-Eagles lack the bright white base to tail shown by Gray-headed Fish-Eagle. Though the base of the tail can appear whitish against the light (like in overhead flight) in Lesser Fish-Eagle, it never appears as bright and pure as in Gray-headed. In addition, the border between the dark terminal band and the pale base is uneven in Lesser, while it is crisp in Gray-headed.
Indeed that's another bird of this plumage-type (the 2 photos are of the same individual - and, by 'dirty white upper tail parts', I take it that the ebirder means the basal part of the undertail). It has very fat wings, which (I guess) is a further indicator of grey-headed fish-eagle.take a look at the picture and comments
I read this the opposite way. Tail fits with lesser (no clear white here), arguably 7 fingers and, although the wings appear "fat", a rough estimate suggests they're more than 2.2x body length (but more accurate measurements welcome...). Tail send relatively short. So lesser for me...Indeed that's another bird of this plumage-type (the 2 photos are of the same individual - and, by 'dirty white upper tail parts', I take it that the ebirder means the basal part of the undertail). It has very fat wings, which (I guess) is a further indicator of grey-headed fish-eagle.
For avoidance of doubt . . . You feel that the sharp proximal edge of the terminal black band is in order for lesser fish-eagle?rectrices are largely dirty, greyish-white and will darken with age