• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Stonechat, Epping Forest? (1 Viewer)

KenM

Well-known member
These images were sent to me today from a colleague in the field.
Looks good for an immature 1st Winter female Stonechat to my eye.
However, it does sport a not insubstantial supercillium and a long primary extension thus, where might it sit in the Stncht. racial spectrum of things?

Cheers
 

Attachments

  • 60CB6512-69D0-42B5-90FD-CB53B13A0F36.jpeg
    60CB6512-69D0-42B5-90FD-CB53B13A0F36.jpeg
    877.5 KB · Views: 83
  • F728BC79-AA08-4891-A42B-788E91E11F54.jpeg
    F728BC79-AA08-4891-A42B-788E91E11F54.jpeg
    1.1 MB · Views: 85
  • 119362F2-F478-4099-AB78-52DA1BD1B811.jpeg
    119362F2-F478-4099-AB78-52DA1BD1B811.jpeg
    1 MB · Views: 85
  • CFBC82BA-9E46-4141-AD66-2218A06DA3B5.jpeg
    CFBC82BA-9E46-4141-AD66-2218A06DA3B5.jpeg
    657.4 KB · Views: 87
Hello Ken,

I agree with you, its a female (type?) Stonechat.
Excellent picture quality makes the slightest dark centers to uppertail-coverts and some rump-feathers visible.
I had a similar bird some time ago, also identified by others as a "normal" Stonechat rubicola by all who have seen it. Thanks again!
Schwarzkehlchen (Schwetzinger Wiesen, SW-Germany, January 2009)

I remember that it appeared strikingly pale, sandy and creamy ("Desert Wheatear") and with a pale, unmarked rump when I first saw it. Therefore I suspected a Siberian Stonechat then. But this changed in different light conditions and with better views and pictures available.
 
Yes Alexander, the lighting is very important as is always a complete suite of features, however I do wonder if some features take more priority than others?
For e.g. subtle rump tone differences, slightly streaked or the complete absence of, the prominence of the supercillium…just to what extent and at what point does it become “subjective”.
Classic birds that tick all the boxes should be straightforward, but then there are those that fall between two stools, even primary projection can be misinterpreted, especially if fore-shortened.
A positive minefield with this group, think I’ll stick with the large white indeterminate gulls, after all they’re all b######s. 🤣
 
Yes Ken,

the slight streaks on the rump of "my" stonechat, only visible in close views/ scope and on good pictures excluded any thoughts of a Siberian Stonechat.

And yes, I still have much to learn with the "what is variation?" and "what is indication of hybridisation?" problem with the large Gulls. But there is/was so much help in the field and here on BF!
 
Warning! This thread is more than 3 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top