• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Unknown wader, Denmark (1 Viewer)

White-rumped Sandpiper seems to fit, though it's interesting that it lacks the pale base to the lower mandible.

Exactly. The bill-shape is not quite right (too long?), and neither is the shape/pattern of the coverts and shoulders. I would like to have seen at least some faint streaking further down the flanks.
Furthermore the primary-projection is hardly long enough.

In sum I would be surprised to see it accepted by the Danish rarity-commitee as a WrS.

But what is it then?
 
Unknown wader Denmark

Exactly. The bill-shape is not quite right (too long?), and neither is the shape/pattern of the coverts and shoulders. I would like to have seen at least some faint streaking further down the flanks.
Furthermore the primary-projection is hardly long enough.

In sum I would be surprised to see it accepted by the Danish rarity-commitee as a WrS.

But what is it then?

At the risk of asking the obvious, has it been seen in flight, ie, has it got a white rump?!!!

Richard
 
In the first series of images (the trio) really looked like the individual had Little Stint in the genes, split supercilium, general plumage details etc. The further image threw a spanner into the works. A very interesting conundrum!
 
It certainly is Stuart, I can see Pec, but what else?

I can see elements of LTS, if that is correct, what a weird pairing :smoke:
 
what about dunlin and sanderling hybrid ?

Welcome to the club!

Did you suddenly just see some Sanderling traits, or were you somewhat influenced by my remark about these two species in the discussion below the 'new' photo?

Never mind.

It's nice to see Sanderling named as a possible parent to this hybrid, cause nobody else did since my original suggestion of "Sunling" four days ago, nor in the previous two day long initiatial 4000-hits discussion.....

Spooky how different the jizz of the bird is in the three-set photos compared to the single shot. Dunlin in the former and Sanderling in the latter?

Mr. Jekyll and mr. Hyde........
 
What a weird bird. I was trying to work out why it reminded me loosely of Broad-billed Sand... and I think its the short legs, split super and dark uppers in the same way it reminds you loosely of WRS.

The long narrow bill must narrow the field
 
What a weird bird. I was trying to work out why it reminded me loosely of Broad-billed Sand... and I think its the short legs, split super and dark uppers in the same way it reminds you loosely of WRS.

The long narrow bill must narrow the field

Oddly Jane I wondered also about a BBS influence too, a Broad-billed x Little Stint :eek!:
 
Welcome to the club!

Did you suddenly just see some Sanderling traits, or were you somewhat influenced by my remark about these two species in the discussion below the 'new' photo?

Never mind.

It's nice to see Sanderling named as a possible parent to this hybrid, cause nobody else did since my original suggestion of "Sunling" four days ago, nor in the previous two day long initiatial 4000-hits discussion.....

Spooky how different the jizz of the bird is in the three-set photos compared to the single shot. Dunlin in the former and Sanderling in the latter?

Mr. Jekyll and mr. Hyde........

There is a hind toe... but it looks a little "pathetic"
 
The breast instantly reminded me of a pec, and the split super of a broad-billed. Is there a known hybrid of those two?

Although i'll toss out pec x sanderling to cover the stubby hind toe. o:)
 
How big was it...? Before I try and make a wear based case for Least Sand!

(which is going to require missing tertials and an unlucky moult based split super!)
 
Warning! This thread is more than 12 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top