attila
Active member
Hi,
Sunday afternoon a dark Pipit was discovered on a gravel island of the Danube south of Budapest. There was an obvious Water Pipit present for comparison as well.
Interesting features we saw on the bird:
- upperparts were olive toned dark brown, not greyish brown as on the Water Pipit present,
- breast and belly base colour had a buffy-washed tone, not clearly white as on the Water Pipit,
- streaking was very prominent on the chest and flanks, getting diffuse on the rear flanks while the Water Pipit had less prominent streaking, especially on the flanks,
- there was some white on the outer tail feathers,
- there was a prominent white eyering, but the supercilium looked present in some angles, but far less than on the Water Pipit,
- the bill was long and darker than that of the Water Pipit.
There were some pics taken but in fairly bad light conditions.
They can be found on the Hungarian birding page here:
http://www.birding.hu/forum.do?temaId=8&method=page&page=4
Here are the links to the picks for those who don't want to loose themselves among all the Hungarian text:
http://www.birding.hu/viewImage.do?img=23892-Y2L60Z8B4APU8CQ7P35EH6AUY88YVMWR
http://www.birding.hu/viewImage.do?img=23895-G0D6WP4TK7X3ZMCPRIN6PFSNBBIO4KS1
http://www.birding.hu/viewImage.do?img=23896-JA76LWD1HY529IQRF2MXLFNMGFYQNM49
http://www.birding.hu/viewImage.do?img=23897-GI14QV5HEJFM3BBF6B60797Q03VDQ79U
The bird was refund and observed by more birdwatchers yesterday until it flew south late afternoon. Pictures were taken again, but light conditions were dull and on some pics the bird seems lighter on the underparts than our field observations suggested:
http://www.birding.hu/viewImage.do?img=23945-NN1VUQ0AEPT8TB9DC9YG65ZSZFSH7L0J
http://www.birding.hu/viewImage.do?img=23944-HT4W4ZLHM2YJ5WXMZVVJ2WW9NLFY9DVZ
http://www.birding.hu/viewImage.do?img=23943-UMBQZJ86HNEHYAL2T3OVE0GV72Y425GX
http://www.birding.hu/viewImage.do?img=23942-9L92QKVA9FWVD6VEAEZY9WQH3EB5NWVF
This has already been posted on e-mail forums, but opinions are controversial so it would be helpful to have some more insight into this identification problem.
Thanks,
Attila
Sunday afternoon a dark Pipit was discovered on a gravel island of the Danube south of Budapest. There was an obvious Water Pipit present for comparison as well.
Interesting features we saw on the bird:
- upperparts were olive toned dark brown, not greyish brown as on the Water Pipit present,
- breast and belly base colour had a buffy-washed tone, not clearly white as on the Water Pipit,
- streaking was very prominent on the chest and flanks, getting diffuse on the rear flanks while the Water Pipit had less prominent streaking, especially on the flanks,
- there was some white on the outer tail feathers,
- there was a prominent white eyering, but the supercilium looked present in some angles, but far less than on the Water Pipit,
- the bill was long and darker than that of the Water Pipit.
There were some pics taken but in fairly bad light conditions.
They can be found on the Hungarian birding page here:
http://www.birding.hu/forum.do?temaId=8&method=page&page=4
Here are the links to the picks for those who don't want to loose themselves among all the Hungarian text:
http://www.birding.hu/viewImage.do?img=23892-Y2L60Z8B4APU8CQ7P35EH6AUY88YVMWR
http://www.birding.hu/viewImage.do?img=23895-G0D6WP4TK7X3ZMCPRIN6PFSNBBIO4KS1
http://www.birding.hu/viewImage.do?img=23896-JA76LWD1HY529IQRF2MXLFNMGFYQNM49
http://www.birding.hu/viewImage.do?img=23897-GI14QV5HEJFM3BBF6B60797Q03VDQ79U
The bird was refund and observed by more birdwatchers yesterday until it flew south late afternoon. Pictures were taken again, but light conditions were dull and on some pics the bird seems lighter on the underparts than our field observations suggested:
http://www.birding.hu/viewImage.do?img=23945-NN1VUQ0AEPT8TB9DC9YG65ZSZFSH7L0J
http://www.birding.hu/viewImage.do?img=23944-HT4W4ZLHM2YJ5WXMZVVJ2WW9NLFY9DVZ
http://www.birding.hu/viewImage.do?img=23943-UMBQZJ86HNEHYAL2T3OVE0GV72Y425GX
http://www.birding.hu/viewImage.do?img=23942-9L92QKVA9FWVD6VEAEZY9WQH3EB5NWVF
This has already been posted on e-mail forums, but opinions are controversial so it would be helpful to have some more insight into this identification problem.
Thanks,
Attila
Last edited: