• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Where are made the Conquest HD (2 Viewers)

Hi James,

You're telling half of the story.
The former Zeiss distributor told me about the eyecups and the Head of Zeiss Optics told me about the five parts and I ended with "who to believe".
Please, if you quote me do that correctly.
Thanks.

Jan
The quote is correct even if there is a subsequent, contrary one….still no closer to understanding true country of origin.
 
Hi James,

You're telling half of the story.
The former Zeiss distributor told me about the eyecups and the Head of Zeiss Optics told me about the five parts and I ended with "who to believe".
Please, if you quote me do that correctly.
Thanks.

Jan
And since the former Zeiss distributor had recently lost the distributorship, perhaps one can understand why he might not feel friendly towards Zeiss.

Lee
 
Big ole yawn... getting old, isn't it? (At least I am. ;))

Oh well, carry on! Then again, not much new under the binocular sun to talk about, is there? 🤣
 
Last edited:
We're desperate to converse about binoculars, with a paucity of worthy subject matter. 😳
There was discussion in a thread(s) years ago which covered precisely this "made in" topic ..... I don't know why some are so vociferous in defence when they already fully know the truth.

I tend to agree with countries with the interpretation that backs the intention of "made in" (ie majority, and/or functionaly constructed in) , rather than countries going by the stict letter of their law - where literally attaching a few letters on a product built elsewhere confers 'made in' status.

Anyway, the buzzards want a go at this carcass now ! 😄


Chosun 🙅‍♀️
 
ZD & Chosun,
Cuz we finally got tired of talking about diopter knobs falling of Victory Pockets! Here's an idea... hmm... how about we start a thread on 8X vs 10X?
Hmm, that's a topic likely to have at least some applicable logic .....

Far better to tackle something more esoteric - like:
"are you actually 'seeing' what you think you see - or do you just 'think' you see it .... ?"



Chosun 🙅‍♀️
 
And since the former Zeiss distributor had recently lost the distributorship, perhaps one can understand why he might not feel friendly towards Zeiss.

Lee
Speaking professionally, one usually does not get solid proprietary information from a company, PR lie as soon as they open their mouth, it is what they are paid to do - to give nothing away, and supply no information that can be verified. So anything a company claims about its own activities should be denied the benefit of doubt and carefully checked. One gets actual facts and verifiable details from the competition and from "sources". Just apply the same rules as you would to politicians: If someone claimed Boris Johnson married Carrie Symonds at such and such a date and they saw it happen, they are quite possibly right, but you wouldn't expect to get a straight answer about such a perfectly honorable event out of Boris himself or from a government spokesman, would you? :)


I can give another typical example: Try and find out about Biden's plan to save the earth from global warming at COP26 from official sources, and you may find a lot of PR material about what is being done for the environment by the new administration- read the snarky comments from left wing guys and environmentalists and you will realise it is all hot air, the substance of any plans Biden did lay out has been quietly removed by his political friends like Sens. Manchin and Sinema.

Edmund
 
Last edited:
Speaking professionally, one usually does not get solid proprietary information from a company, PR lie as soon as they open their mouth, it is what they are paid to do - to give nothing away, and supply no information that can be verified. So anything a company claims about its own activities should be denied the benefit of doubt and carefully checked. One gets actual facts and verifiable details from the competition and from "sources". Just apply the same rules as you would to politicians: If someone claimed Boris Johnson married Carrie Symonds at such and such a date and they saw it happen, they are quite possibly right, but you wouldn't expect to get a straight answer about such a perfectly honorable event out of Boris himself or from a government spokesman, would you? :)


I can give another typical example: Try and find out about Biden's plan to save the earth from global warming at COP26 from official sources, and you may find a lot of PR material about what is being done for the environment by the new administration- read the snarky comments from left wing guys and environmentalists and you will realise it is all hot air, the substance of any plans Biden did lay out has been quietly removed by his political friends like Sens. Manchin and Sinema.

Edmund
Speaking professionally there are often good commercial reasons why information about new product development is kept secret and protected by non-disclosure agreements signed by employees and sub-contractors and their employees. Surprising the competitors is one motivation and avoiding telling competitors how to develop similar products is another. I have been involved in a few projects such as this in years past. It is not always as simple as PR professionals being congenitally devious and deceitful although for sure this is what it can look like at times.

Lee
 
Speaking professionally there are often good commercial reasons why information about new product development is kept secret and protected by non-disclosure agreements signed by employees and sub-contractors and their employees. Surprising the competitors is one motivation and avoiding telling competitors how to develop similar products is another. I have been involved in a few projects such as this in years past. It is not always as simple as PR professionals being congenitally devious and deceitful although for sure this is what it can look like at times.

Lee
Amen.
 
Speaking professionally there are often good commercial reasons why information about new product development is kept secret and protected by non-disclosure agreements signed by employees and sub-contractors and their employees. Surprising the competitors is one motivation and avoiding telling competitors how to develop similar products is another. I have been involved in a few projects such as this in years past. It is not always as simple as PR professionals being congenitally devious and deceitful although for sure this is what it can look like at times.

Lee
Lee,

I don't think most PR people are congenitally devious and deceitful, nor do I think they do it for fun, I think they are trained to be devious and deceitful, because that's basically their job description, and they do it because it pays the bills and beats digging ditches for a living :)

Of course that's just my opinion as an ex-journalist. On a personal level, I enjoy socialising with them, because they're often very nice, and it does help that they seem to have unlimited expense accounts. They're usually very decent people and after a while you have a relationship, and they don't feed you false info that makes you look bad.

Edmund
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top