-
Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.
Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where the Heck is Denco? (6 Viewers)
- Thread starter quincy88
- Start date
I am still here! I had to change my username because it was too much like an email. It is now Dennis Mau.
Haha. Oh good.
I like your new username. Glad all is well.
Thanks!
What a nice compliment - I‘m sure he appreciates it!
Jos Stratford
Eastern Exile
He taking 'a short break'
NDhunter
Experienced observer
He needs a total ban, you know that and Steve knows that.
Jerry
Jos Stratford
Eastern Exile
Even when he's not here, you can't resist talking about him or attacking him. The problem was not one-sided.
edwincjones
Well-known member
I am really tired of this anti Dennis bannor
edj
edj
jafritten
Well-known member
Positively tiresome. Why don't they just use the ignore button and enjoy the forum?
This is spiteful and malicious.
Jos Stratford
Eastern Exile
Agree, the question has been answered, the thread will just turn into another Denco debate 🙄
Some don't like it when he is here, seems they still can't rest when not.
Thread locked.
Dennis is taking some time out to reset, We come to this agreement and have done for many years, troubadour (lee) used to sort
this out but as he has sadly passed, it has been left to admin. For the record he rarely bites back even though he is attacked a lot,
sure he posts the same posts and changes his mind on whatever he deems to be the best Binocular at the time, but that is not against
forum rules.
He unfortunately got into it with another member and they are both taking a rest.
It is as simple as that.
Steve
this out but as he has sadly passed, it has been left to admin. For the record he rarely bites back even though he is attacked a lot,
sure he posts the same posts and changes his mind on whatever he deems to be the best Binocular at the time, but that is not against
forum rules.
He unfortunately got into it with another member and they are both taking a rest.
It is as simple as that.
Steve
Steve,
One could argue I’m wearing this point out, I get it. Seems ironically this is the explanation for the situation. Perhaps “forum rules” is too strong a way of saying it. Moderators need some guidelines. Members to. The all posts are welcome policy, in fact all posts are sorta equal is not working.
In my five years here that Glare Monster thread, still standing far as I know, was this situation to the extreme. Dennis’ idea of science with lee gone and the thing unchecked so anyone coming to visit looking for quality information would be…. What? Informed? Misled?
tenex
reality-based
The forum rules are very simple; click "Help" at the lower right to find them. A single sentence specifies what will not be tolerated:
"You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is defamatory, abusive, hateful, threatening, spam or spam-like, likely to offend, contains adult or objectionable content, contains personal information of others, risks copyright infringement, encourages unlawful activity, or otherwise violates any laws."
Note that there is no mention of persistently false, misleading, irrelevant, prolific, repetitive, or argumentative content being considered a problem. And everything is ultimately just at the discretion of the providers anyway:
"We may remove or modify any Content submitted at any time, with or without cause, with or without notice. Requests for Content to be removed or modified will be undertaken only at our discretion. We may terminate your access to all or any part of the Service at any time, with or without cause, with or without notice."
That's it. There is nothing to clarify, no point to further discussion.
"You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is defamatory, abusive, hateful, threatening, spam or spam-like, likely to offend, contains adult or objectionable content, contains personal information of others, risks copyright infringement, encourages unlawful activity, or otherwise violates any laws."
Note that there is no mention of persistently false, misleading, irrelevant, prolific, repetitive, or argumentative content being considered a problem. And everything is ultimately just at the discretion of the providers anyway:
"We may remove or modify any Content submitted at any time, with or without cause, with or without notice. Requests for Content to be removed or modified will be undertaken only at our discretion. We may terminate your access to all or any part of the Service at any time, with or without cause, with or without notice."
That's it. There is nothing to clarify, no point to further discussion.
Similar threads
