PeterPS
Well-Known Member
Henry,
I am familiar with the discussion in the thread that you mentioned. I guess the points that I was trying to make were these:
-the SF distortion is more complex than SV's and I am not sure that the effect induced by it should be called RB like for the SV, as a part of the SF's FoV should not roll (due to pincushion)----but I might be mistaken; I mean it does not look like a rolling globe, does it?
-I thought that the complex pincushion+barrel distortion of the SF might reduce the "RB" effect, compared with SV, but people who are affected by RB appear to suggest the opposite---maybe it is the barrel distortion that amplifies the effect, but then how about the pincushion distortion that should attenuate/eliminate it for a large part of the FoV?
Peter.
I am familiar with the discussion in the thread that you mentioned. I guess the points that I was trying to make were these:
-the SF distortion is more complex than SV's and I am not sure that the effect induced by it should be called RB like for the SV, as a part of the SF's FoV should not roll (due to pincushion)----but I might be mistaken; I mean it does not look like a rolling globe, does it?
-I thought that the complex pincushion+barrel distortion of the SF might reduce the "RB" effect, compared with SV, but people who are affected by RB appear to suggest the opposite---maybe it is the barrel distortion that amplifies the effect, but then how about the pincushion distortion that should attenuate/eliminate it for a large part of the FoV?
Peter.
Last edited: