Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.
Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
It's my understanding that, generally speaking, eye relief and FOV are often inversely proportional. What is the affect, if any, roof vs porro design has on this?
It's my understanding that, generally speaking, eye relief and FOV are often inversely proportional. What is the affect, if any, roof vs porro design has on this?
"Often" is the operative word here--not "always." One example of the opposite effect is the notorious example of the ocular lenses used in the 7 x 42 roof prism binoculars in the 1980's in the Leitz Trinovid and the Zeiss Dialyt binoculars which gave both a very long ER and a very wide FOV. This seems to have been rather unique to the 7 x 42 format and did not extend to other formats like 8 x 42 or 8 x 32 where the ER got shorter when the FOV got wider.
It is my understanding that both ER and FOV are determined by the optical design of the ocular lens. I may be wrong, but I don't think the prism's used have much affect unless they change the effective focal length of the binocular by shortening or lengthening it. Maybe this is why some very wide 8 x porro's with oversize prism's like the Nikon 8 x 30 EII and Swift 8 .5 x 44 model 804 had short ER?
In any case, it is a subject that deserves some "enlightened" comment by our resident experts. :stuck:
Assuming adequate prism dimensions, FOV will generally be greater, the lower the magnification.
Assuming similar eyepiece designs, eye relief will increase with the focal length of the eyepiece.
As magnification is the ratio of objective focal length to eyepiece focal length and most binoculars, irrespective of their configuration have focal ratios around f/4.5, one could say that eye relief increases with objective diameter and decreasing magnification.
Of course, complex designs can increase eye relief in the same way that the front lens element of a telephoto lens can be closer to the film plane than its focal length or that the rear element of a wide-angle retrofocus lens can be further away from the film plane than its focal length.
Depth of field decreases with distance and increasing magnification, i.e. there will be no significant differences in depth of field between bins of the same magnification focussed on the same object.