Katy Penland said:Sorry, guys, gotta disagree with you and go with Hairy. Downy's bill is not only noticeably shorter but the very conspicuous tuft on the upper mandible shortens it even more. An easy rule of thumb: Downy's bill is less than half the overall length of the head itself. In Lassa's bird, which even though it looks like there's a bit of camera angle to deal with, the bill is clearly much longer than that.
Gaga said:Still not sure... even with the camera angle, I find that this bill seems very short! Moreover, I don't know if it's noise in the picture (or if I'm just hallucinating...), but it seems to have dark spots on external rectrices! Therefore, I would say that's a downy.
Hey gthang,we're still the W'pecker experts,it's a Downy!...don't be swayed,man!gthang said:Dang Grousemore, our posts crossed!
We're the woodpecker experts.
then...
what?..the one with the waggly tail?gthang said:. duhhhhhh....how much is dat doggy in da window.......?
Don't I know it! I've seen both, but not often enough to have them off pat. Although I favour Hairy, one thing has me wondering: the bill base looks very fine - is that a pro Downy feature? There aren't many pictures of Hairy on the net, but they do seem to indicate that it has a thicker bill base. Or am I imagining that?Grousemore said:what?..the one with the waggly tail?
Seriously,I've seen both on numerous occasions in Florida,twice on the same tree and I am still with Downy;photographs can be deceiving though![]()
crispycreme said:Also, note the shape of the back of the head. The Downy has a more angular shape, whereas the Hairy is more rounded (similar to comparing a Lesser Scaup with a Greater).