• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Accipiter , Belgium (1 Viewer)

Hello,

thanks to all for correction and especially to Torchepot for asking Andrew Butler and him for commenting!

I came back to this thread several times now and searched for reasons why this Goshawk looks so small and not powerful. But there is no reason: judging size of lone birds is notoriously unreliable. Its as easy as that. Thanks Butty!
 
Hello,

thanks to all for correction and especially to Torchepot for asking Andrew Butler and him for commenting!

I came back to this thread several times now and searched for reasons why this Goshawk looks so small and not powerful. But there is no reason: judging size of lone birds is notoriously unreliable. Its as easy as that. Thanks Butty!

I find it odd, that when viewing a “close” subject bird as this from a shot, it’s “real” size is difficult to ascertain, yet in the field it should be more apparent Alexander, even though all the comparative shrubbery is s/s relatively when viewing in the field, or as in this case from an image. 👍
 
some indication of Gos uppertail barring (which is another very reliable feature but just a guess in this picture)
While I don't have the Collins guide in front of me now, I don't remember seeing it there. Could you write more about the difference so that I can make sure I understand that correctly?

(for reference, some photos of both birds' uppertails in the files below)
 

Attachments

  • 02690_ENG_Accipiter_nisus_aranzadi.pdf
    8.1 MB · Views: 36
  • 02670_ENG_Accipiter_gentilis_aranzadi.pdf
    8.4 MB · Views: 20
While I don't have the Collins guide in front of me now, I don't remember seeing it there. Could you write more about the difference so that I can make sure I understand that correctly?
The barring in Gos is not a nice bar but quite distorted and always bordered by a well visible white line never present in Sparrowhawk which has much more regular rectangular bars
 
The barring in Gos is not a nice bar but quite distorted and always bordered by a well visible white line never present in Sparrowhawk which has much more regular rectangular bars
I've seen this quoted on BF before, but I'm not sure that it's the case, particularly
always bordered by a well visible white line
Trawling through images of Goshawk it certainly seems to be true for juvenile birds, but as they age it seems to dissappear. Interestingly there seems to be a gender difference which I've not heard mentioned. The pale distal edge to the dark bands on the upper surface of the tail appears more prominent in young females and seems to be retained for longer. Some adult males (and females?) seem to show little or no barring to the upper surface of the tail.
In general the barring on the underside of the wings and tail seems to become less and less distinct with age and the the barring on the breast and belly becomes finer. Some second plumage birds (particularly males?) appear to show very bold coarse barring on the chest (though some appear to show a kind of "half-way house" between juvenile and adult).
The situation is complicated by variation in plumage between individuals and subspecies.
 
Pattern of uppertail-barring has always seemed to me to be, if present, a good feature to exclude sparrowhawk. The point for ID purposes is not whether goshawk sometimes doesn't show it but whether sparrowhawk ever shows it - and, as far as I'm aware, sparrowhawk never does show it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top