Woen
Well-known member

Update time!
Today I tested the Zeiss Conquest 8x42 against the Zeiss Victory SF 8x42. This was not planned because I went for a Victory Pocket vs Swarovski CL comparison. Also I could test a Leica Noctivid 10x42, first Leica experience and a second hand Zeiss Conquest 8x56.
Conquest v.s. SF: A brick v.s. a pack of oatmeal (but one in a sturdy package), what a difference between those two in build and weight. Optically, they are both great but one is even greater. Found a peregrine falcon sitting on a church tower about 350/400 meters away while testing all the binoculars. I could recognize the bird with all of them (first year bird). The SF made everything even better what a view.
I hoped to just go in the store, choose a compact and take it with me everywhere and be done with that chapter, but they are all difficult to use. The Zeiss a bit more easy because of the one hinch, it's quicker. Both are great in every optic part but just, small, tiny, difficult. I like the idea of having a binocular with me even in difficult conditions but they are tiny in every way.
The big thing I found out is that I have been extremely lucky with every binocular I've had until this day. The biggest difference between them all for me is ease of use. I pick em up, look through em, and it's immediatly perfect or I have to adjust things here and there.
I wear glasses, and a compact is trying to find the best place, even pushing against my glasses! Without glasses it's more like hovering. But all in all I found it really difficult to get a undisturbed round view.
But with the other binoculars I had the same problem, finding a quick nice and round view. The Conquests did not do that immediatley but the SF did. It's not just a wider FOV but more of a less black around the edges view! How do people get a almost no black around the edges view? Is that something I do wrong?
Today I tested the Zeiss Conquest 8x42 against the Zeiss Victory SF 8x42. This was not planned because I went for a Victory Pocket vs Swarovski CL comparison. Also I could test a Leica Noctivid 10x42, first Leica experience and a second hand Zeiss Conquest 8x56.
Conquest v.s. SF: A brick v.s. a pack of oatmeal (but one in a sturdy package), what a difference between those two in build and weight. Optically, they are both great but one is even greater. Found a peregrine falcon sitting on a church tower about 350/400 meters away while testing all the binoculars. I could recognize the bird with all of them (first year bird). The SF made everything even better what a view.
I hoped to just go in the store, choose a compact and take it with me everywhere and be done with that chapter, but they are all difficult to use. The Zeiss a bit more easy because of the one hinch, it's quicker. Both are great in every optic part but just, small, tiny, difficult. I like the idea of having a binocular with me even in difficult conditions but they are tiny in every way.
The big thing I found out is that I have been extremely lucky with every binocular I've had until this day. The biggest difference between them all for me is ease of use. I pick em up, look through em, and it's immediatly perfect or I have to adjust things here and there.
I wear glasses, and a compact is trying to find the best place, even pushing against my glasses! Without glasses it's more like hovering. But all in all I found it really difficult to get a undisturbed round view.
But with the other binoculars I had the same problem, finding a quick nice and round view. The Conquests did not do that immediatley but the SF did. It's not just a wider FOV but more of a less black around the edges view! How do people get a almost no black around the edges view? Is that something I do wrong?