• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Azan Khan

Active member
Posting it on behalf of a friend, Atif Taj.
Photos taken on 29 August, 2022
Location: Islamabad, Pakistan

Can you please help me ID this drongo? It looks odd for both of the common species found in the country. It has certain features of Hair-crested Drongo but lacks the backward curls in tail and also the bill look odd for this species. So what is it, kindly help. I'd really appreciate your response which I always find valuable.

So far, we have three species reported from Pakistan.

1) Black Drongo - common/resident
2) Ashy Drongo - common/resident
3) Hair-crested Drongo - recorded just once from the country.
 

Attachments

  • IMG-20220921-WA0023.jpg
    IMG-20220921-WA0023.jpg
    128.9 KB · Views: 34
  • IMG-20220921-WA0024.jpg
    IMG-20220921-WA0024.jpg
    139.2 KB · Views: 34
  • FB_IMG_1663681027187.jpg
    FB_IMG_1663681027187.jpg
    29.4 KB · Views: 33
As Butty mentions, no doubt as per the identification, it's a Hair-crested Drongo. As it shows a bit of yellow at the gape, and the tail not fully developed, it appears to be an immature.

Well done and fantastic record!

James
 
As Butty mentions, no doubt as per the identification, it's a Hair-crested Drongo. As it shows a bit of yellow at the gape, and the tail not fully developed, it appears to be an immature.

Well done and fantastic record!

James
No doubt on ID and a great record!

But given the state of moult (moult contrast in primaries, secondaries, tail and contour feathers) isn't it an adult? I don't know moult patterns of HcD, but I wouldn't expect them to have a complete moult in their first year.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 2 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top