brocknroller
porromaniac
I had none of the problems Brock talks about with Nikon 8x32LX. Just thought I was chime in, in case some people might think there was a problem with this sample LX. No trouble with diopter control, focuser speed, the focuser was a dream in this binocular. It just shows some people have problems and others don't I guess.
Thanks for chiming in, lest someone should suspect that I tried to stick you with a bad sample (or you Paul when you traded him the LX for his 8x32 SE).
For our different reasons, we both decided we liked the 8x32 SE better, although I still contend that the LX has the "superior" coatings, with noticeably better color saturation and contrast. It also has a smoother, more ergonomic focuser, but too faaaast for my eyes to catch up.
For me, the SE has better ergonomics, better perception of depth, and 3-D effect, and those factors won out.
The 8x30 EII has the "edg" over the SE in some ways, with it's brighter image, snappier colors, and wider FOV.
If I were Bill Gates, before I handed over my $58 billion fortune to charity, I would commission Nikon to make me a custom bin, which would have the 8.8* FOV of the 8x30 EII; the ergonomics, DOF, and edge performance of the SE; the internal focus, color saturation, contrast, and locking right diopter control of the LX; and the color correction, eyecups, and ER of the EDG.
The Nikon Superior ED. Yours for only $6,999. Pocket change for Bill.