morninglight
Well-known member
Is it? has this been scientificallly proven? Or is this just some random statement to back your theory?
The picture you show does not have, with any sense of the imagination a fish displayed on its head. But this holds true for most of your claims.
The tittle shows the theory or hypothesis. The photos or examples are evidences. The evidences that some people ask for actually are the evidences of evidences, or the evidences of those resemblances. I have to say sorry. I think it is infeasible and also unnecessary. You have freedom to believe or not.
If with my theory, common people can forecast birds' habits better according to birds' appearances, or my theory can help common people understand birds
colorful plumage better, the theory must provide information and hence is scientific.
Please have a look at this review by the Journal Science: Male Guppies Imitate Food and Get Sex.
[url]http://news.sciencemag.org/2002/02/male-guppies-imitate-food-and-get-sex[/URL]
Do you think this resemblance between the orange spots and the food is better than that between a prawn's back and a tufted puffin's upper beak? or that between a butterfly and a sunbittern, or that between Beikal Teal's face and alluvions in a river?
Please be fair!