• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

ID please-Is it a Little Stint or anything else? (1 Viewer)

pandoo

Member
South Korea
Photo taken: September 24th
In South Korea

Could this be a little sandpiper? Its bill and legs appear longer than those of red-necked sandpiper, and the wing coverts and tertial edges are reddish brown.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4191.jpeg
    IMG_4191.jpeg
    1.6 MB · Views: 143
Nothing here that rules out Red-necked Stint, which can be richly coloured and have a split supercilium. Only 'odd' features are the slightly darker centres to coverts, which tend to be plainer and greyer with just black shaft, but even these here are within RnS variation. More side-on photos would be helpful



 
Structurally it looks rather more like a Red-necked to me - the bill doesn't seem particularly long, and is fairly uniform along the length with a blunt tip, rather than tapering to a thin point as I expect on Little. The legs don't seem very long either, but this is a bit hard to judge as the closer leg is raised on tiptoe, making it look longer.
I don't really see enough of either species (and especially Little) in juvenile plumage to comment on the fine details, but I agree with Brian that Red-necked certainly can look as richly-coloured as this.
 
It’s often surprisingly difficult to assess the structure of a bird on a close-up, frame-filling shot as this one. And I do think that it’s not easy to assess the bird’s structure in this instance - including the bill shape because of the dark background- but it doesn’t look wrong for Little stint to me. Although I agree that more images would be welcome in this instance.

Plumage-wise I think this bird fits quite well with what would be expected of many late September 1cy LS, when wear start to affect the brightness of the feather fringes: many juv LS start to look duller, less bright rufous at this time of the year than earlier in the season.

I can see a few plumage features that are at odds with juv RNS. Some have already been mentioned such as the dark greater coverts that consequently lack the contrasting dark shaft streak - I haven’t found any juv RNS with the greater coverts that dark but I’ll take they exist as per Brian’s remark above.

But here are a couple more « oddities », were the bird a RNS:
  • the white tramline on the back may indeed be present in RNS, but can they be so long, thick and obvious as here ? Again I haven’t located any individual with comparably long white tramlines
  • Some scapulars show a black center that is shaped like the central petal of a fleur-de-lis - see attached pic to highlight what I mean- with a very long white fringe along the feathers edge (see the edited pic with arrows pointing at those scapulars).
I failed to find any juv RNS with this peculiar scapular pattern even among bright individuals while this is common in juv LS: ML609389734 - Little Stint - Macaulay Library

Here are a couple more of these « bright » RNS:
ML609854438 - Red-necked Stint - Macaulay Library
Little Stint(Calidris minuta) Bird Mongolia (labelled as a Little stint but clearly a RNS)
Note how the white fringes to the scaps are mainly confined to the feathers tip and thus appear somewhat neater (and thicker) compared to the OP bird. The late Martin Gardner once commented that these white fringes/tips found in RNS look like nails with « French manucure ». Something that stuck in my mind. And the dark centers appear somewhat blunt, less lanceolated and more square than in LS.

Again I would like to see more images but I think the sum of evidence visible here are in favour of Little stint.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2561.jpeg
    IMG_2561.jpeg
    15.2 KB · Views: 28
  • IMG_2560.jpeg
    IMG_2560.jpeg
    1.6 MB · Views: 30
It’s often surprisingly difficult to assess the structure of a bird on a close-up, frame-filling shot as this one. And I do think that it’s not easy to assess the bird’s structure in this instance - including the bill shape because of the dark background- but it doesn’t look wrong for Little stint to me. Although I agree that more images would be welcome in this instance.

Plumage-wise I think this bird fits quite well with what would be expected of many late September 1cy LS, when wear start to affect the brightness of the feather fringes: many juv LS start to look duller, less bright rufous at this time of the year than earlier in the season.

I can see a few plumage features that are at odds with juv RNS. Some have already been mentioned such as the dark greater coverts that consequently lack the contrasting dark shaft streak - I haven’t found any juv RNS with the greater coverts that dark but I’ll take they exist as per Brian’s remark above.

But here are a couple more « oddities », were the bird a RNS:
  • the white tramline on the back may indeed be present in RNS, but can they be so long, thick and obvious as here ? Again I haven’t located any individual with comparably long white tramlines
  • Some scapulars show a black center that is shaped like the central petal of a fleur-de-lis - see attached pic to highlight what I mean- with a very long white fringe along the feathers edge (see the edited pic with arrows pointing at those scapulars).
I failed to find any juv RNS with this peculiar scapular pattern even among bright individuals while this is common in juv LS: ML609389734 - Little Stint - Macaulay Library

Here are a couple more of these « bright » RNS:
ML609854438 - Red-necked Stint - Macaulay Library
Little Stint(Calidris minuta) Bird Mongolia (labelled as a Little stint but clearly a RNS)
Note how the white fringes to the scaps are mainly confined to the feathers tip and thus appear somewhat neater (and thicker) compared to the OP bird. The late Martin Gardner once commented that these white fringes/tips found in RNS look like nails with « French manucure ». Something that stuck in my mind. And the dark centers appear somewhat blunt, less lanceolated and more square than in LS.

Again I would like to see more images but I think the sum of evidence visible here are in favour of Little stint.
Structurally it looks rather more like a Red-necked to me - the bill doesn't seem particularly long, and is fairly uniform along the length with a blunt tip, rather than tapering to a thin point as I expect on Little. The legs don't seem very long either, but this is a bit hard to judge as the closer leg is raised on tiptoe, making it look longer.
I don't really see enough of either species (and especially Little) in juvenile plumage to comment on the fine details, but I agree with Brian that Red-necked certainly can look as richly-coloured as this.
Nothing here that rules out Red-necked Stint, which can be richly coloured and have a split supercilium. Only 'odd' features are the slightly darker centres to coverts, which tend to be plainer and greyer with just black shaft, but even these here are within RnS variation. More side-on photos would be helpful



Thank you all so much for your kind words!

I'm uploading other photos as well. Please check them out.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4193.jpeg
    IMG_4193.jpeg
    1.7 MB · Views: 47
  • IMG_4192.jpeg
    IMG_4192.jpeg
    2 MB · Views: 45
  • IMG_4189.jpeg
    IMG_4189.jpeg
    3.7 MB · Views: 46
  • IMG_4190.jpeg
    IMG_4190.jpeg
    3.9 MB · Views: 42
  • IMG_4194.jpeg
    IMG_4194.jpeg
    2.2 MB · Views: 44
Thank you all so much for your kind words!

I'm uploading other photos as well. Please check them out.
Well for future reference please note that if you happen to have several pictures of a certain bird available, it’s always better to upload more than one. That usually makes the ID process of difficult birds considerably simpler.

I guess there won’t be any more disagreement or hesitation now with the new set of pics: it’s a Little stint.
 
Well for future reference please note that if you happen to have several pictures of a certain bird available, it’s always better to upload more than one. That usually makes the ID process of difficult birds considerably simpler.

I guess there won’t be any more disagreement or hesitation now with the new set of pics: it’s a Little stint.
I'm so grateful for all the help I've received. I'm so sorry for confusing you by only uploading one photo. I'll try to upload more in the future!
Thank you again❤️
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top