Series 2 Mountaineer vs Series 2 Traveler is where I got very confused when I was researching our purchase.Definitely a Mountaineer, not a Traveler. My go-to tripod is a GT2541, the predecessor of the GT2542, for both my 60mm and my 82mm scope. I personally prefer tripods with three leg sections though. But for general use a shorter tripod with four leg sections is more convenient. That said, I think both the Series 2 and Series 3 Mountaineers fit into the category "medium-sized tripod" ...🙃
The GT2542 is what I'd get. Or an equivalent tripod from another manufacturer if the price of the Gitzos seems too high. (And they really are expensive!)
Edit: The head question ... Either a Manfrotto 500AH or a Gitzo head. I personally don't like the Sirui heads. My standard head on the 2541 is a Gitzo 2180 (out of production), the Manfrotto 500AH is on one of my old aluminium Gitzos (three sections, about a kilo heavier than the GT2541, large leg spread, very stable).
Hermann
According to Gitzo's tech specs, the Mountaineer GT2542 and the Traveler GT2545 have identical leg diameters for each leg section. Both are Series 2 CF. The Mountaineer is rated for 48 lbs of load capacity vs the Traveler's rating of 26 lbs of load capacity. The Mountaineer's legs spread to a wider angle than the Traveler's, could that help increase the load rating for the Mountaineer?
The Series 2 Traveler is about 1/2 the cost of the Series 2 Mountaineer here in the US. That's a substantial price difference.
Given that both models have the same leg diameter (meaning they should offer similar stability), and both are Series 2 CF, what differences do you see that causes you to select the Mountaineer between these two models?
In terms of price vs quality... For 1/2 the price of the Mountaineer, would the Gitzo Traveler GT2545 be a higher quality choice versus another brand?
Last edited: