BTW: I have a sample of the B1 Plus 8x32 and the 10x42 HD coming my way. Had I known that the Meopro Air was released I would have asked for a 8x32 Meopro Air as well!
There's an 8x32 MeoPro Air as well? Or was that a hypothetical?
Also in terms of outsourcing, it may be more than just the housing. In
Lee's interview with Miloš Slany from Meopta he answers with a simple "yes" to the question of whether the MeoPro Air is "made using out-sourced components in the same way as the MeoPros, and assembled in Czechia". It wouldn't surprise me if most of the binocular is produced elsewhere.
Also, the term "they have the same glass" is somewhat ambiguous. Does "the same glass" mean the glass is literally the same, or does it mean the design/optical system is the same, or does it just mean the specifications for the glass are the same (but it's made by someone else). Since Meopta is one of the few brands that is actually capable of manufacturing their own binoculars (including the glass), it's hard to know.
We all know these terms are used loosly. For example, Vortex moved their Razor HD production from Japan to China, and they claim it's the "same glass" with the same performance as before, but (obviously) cheaper to produce. In this case it's probably an identical product, just produced in a different place (perhaps with inferior QC, perhaps not). We also all know the Conquest HD (among others) is produced in Japan by Kamakura, but people still call it "German glass". If the glass is made in Japan to meet the specs defined by the designer in Germany (or the Czech Rep), and then assembled in Germany/Czech, is it "the same glass" as if they'd made the same stuff in house?
It doesn't really matter to me that much, honestly, as long as the performance and reliability is the same. If that allows them to deliver the same effective optical quality as the Meostar B1 in a less expensive, lighter weight housing, bring it on! ( But please bring on the 8x32 model also, with fatter eyecups
)