• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Skipper id Please Kefalonia (1 Viewer)

naturenutz

Well-known member
Took this photo last week in Kefalonia , i think I've narrowed it down too either meditteranean skipper or pygmy skipper , its a good pic so hoping someone can confirm one way or the other .
cheers
vic
 

Attachments

  • med skipper1.jpg
    med skipper1.jpg
    160.2 KB · Views: 59
I have no experience of these 2, but from the Collins:
Male Med Skipper-Unh cilia-like hairs on costa long and dense (cf G. pumilio Pigmy Skipper)
Male Pigmy Skipper-Unh cilia-like hairs on costa short and sparse (cf G. nostrodamus Med Skipper)
With the forewing not showing, this is a tough one to call. The female Med does not appear to have any spots on the Unh. This one has obscure pale spots. Also the Med is pale greyish brown Ups, while the Pigmy is dark brown Ups. Did you see or photograph the upper side?

unh = underside hindwing
ups = upperside fore and hindwings
costa = top edge of wing (both fore and hindwing)
 
Last edited:
Thanks Andy , I do have more pics , but maybe
Not of the same individual but from the same beach area.
I have seen faint spots on the upper wing on at least one individual.
The upper wings were quite a dark almost chocolate brown on some .
I will search out Some upper wing pics although I don't think
They opened up the wings fully at any point. Usually settled
With wings closed or partially open.
 
The Chocolate uppers point to Pigmy Skipper, naturenutz, so I think that probably the safe bet. I would like other opinions from those familiar with either species that would help to confirm my id.
 
Last edited:
Warning! This thread is more than 11 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top