KnockerNorton
Well-known member
You are still attempting to bring into the discussion something (causes of mortality) that I said nothing about, and you are trying to justify the attempt by saying that because there are different causes, the statistics has to be divided up according to the different causes to prevent the statistics from being misleading. I disagree. 'Combined' statistics can very well be very meaningful. True, a car insurance company would need a separate statistic on fatal traffic accidents, and a medical insurance company would need a separate statistic on fatal medical conditions, but the government housing department would need a 'combined' statistic for all fatalities, i.e. not differentiating between the different causes of fatalities. It really depends on the purpose whether or not a certain statistic makes sense for a certain purpose. The purpose of my initial post was to show the high mortality, not causes of mortality, etc (frankly, I'm getting tired of reiterating this).
For this purpose of showing high mortality, my 'combined' statistic from egg to third winter is very well meaningful. The reasoning behind the 'combined' statistic is also shown in my initial post.
On the magnitude of the numbers, there are indeed no reliable numbers for the chickadee. We are obviously reading the numbers differently, and it is already surprising that our readings of those unreliable numbers differ by only a percentage, not a factor. There is not much to go on to sort out such small differences with more precision.
Oh you do make me chortle! Have you read Susan Smith's book, The Black-Capped Chickadee: Behavioral Ecology and Natural History?
Guzano - chickadees roost singly, in shallow cavities or thick vegetation. No one is quite sure what determines the location of their roost, or how often they switch sites.