SUPPRESSOR
Well-known member

Me too.Andy, I am of those who does not have any condensation issues on either of the two x42s nor the 8x32
Canip
Me too.Andy, I am of those who does not have any condensation issues on either of the two x42s nor the 8x32
Canip
I'd say the large size of the eyeglass elements and perhaps the very low profile of the eyecups themselves, which may put the warm, moist eyeballs closer to the glass, which might be the culprit. I couldn't say whether the coatings are playing a role or not.I’ve had this happen before with other optics, but it did seem like it was a little worse with these. In my opinion, I’m thinking it may be partially due to the coating on the external glass elements as well as the large size of the ocular elements.....
Do you have any idea what the relative humidity or the dewpoint was at that time?I recently experienced more condensation than expected while using my 10x32 NL’s on a 50 degree morning. I’ve had this happen before with other optics, but it did seem like it was a little worse with these. In my opinion, I’m thinking it may be partially due to the coating on the external glass elements as well as the large size of the ocular elements.
it didn’t bother me too much. Just something to be aware of and deal with by holding them away from your face before it condensates too bad.
I think that is very relevant point, especially if the user was wearing glasses and still observed condensation. With glasses, you wouldn't expect condensation unless the moisture was already in the air and not coming from his face.Do you have any idea what the relative humidity or the dewpoint was at that time?
I don’t wear glasses and do not know the specific environmentals at that time. Like Bill said, the relatively low profile eye cups and large ocular elements are the most likely culprits. I have the eye cups extended 2 clicks up from all the way in and also have the Winged Eyecups installed to reduce stray light from coming in from the sides. I definitely notice bright sunlight making it onto the large oculars when I don’t have them installed, causing bright flare spots. These differ from the glare on the objective lenses, but that’s for the many other threads regarding this issue!Do you have any idea what the relative humidity or the dewpoint was at that time?
So you have made the sealed chamber even tighter,and moved your eyeballs closer to the lenses.I don’t wear glasses and do not know the specific environmentals at that time. Like Bill said, the relatively low profile eye cups and large ocular elements are the most likely culprits. I have the eye cups extended 2 clicks up from all the way in and also have the Winged Eyecups installed to reduce stray light from coming in from the sides. I definitely notice bright sunlight making it onto the large oculars when I don’t have them installed, causing bright flare spots. These differ from the glare on the objective lenses, but that’s for the many other threads regarding this issue!
I think Leica responded to perception like yours with the Noctivid with excellent 19mm Eye relief. Worked perfectly for me! although the FOV/AFOV is barely adequate!Regarding eye relief: from a non-eyeglass point of view it can seem that manufacturers (except Leica) are already going to extremes to accommodate demands from glasses wearers, thereby (with all the compromises involved in optical design) imposing costs in performance, mass, and/or price on everyone else.
For others the FOV/APOV is fine, especially not compressed.I think Leica responded to perception like yours with the Noctivid with excellent 19mm Eye relief. Worked perfectly for me! although the FOV/AFOV is barely adequate!