henry link
Well-known member
Sometimes it seems that photography and visual optics operate in different universes. Neither of the two images above would represent what we would see through a good telescope, which would have both high visual contrast and high resolution.
I'm not much interested in camera optics, so I just haven't pursued the reasons why photographic images like these are deficient. The image on the left appears to have higher wavefront errors, but I can't tell what they are - maybe spherical aberration and/or astigmatism? The one on the right could be a well figured optic, but with lots of light loss and scatter, like what would occur in a multi-element lens with no AR coating and/or poor baffling.
I'm not much interested in camera optics, so I just haven't pursued the reasons why photographic images like these are deficient. The image on the left appears to have higher wavefront errors, but I can't tell what they are - maybe spherical aberration and/or astigmatism? The one on the right could be a well figured optic, but with lots of light loss and scatter, like what would occur in a multi-element lens with no AR coating and/or poor baffling.