Sleeper said:regarding the focus wheel.......yes!!!! The wheel does have slight play which is apparent when the wheel is being turned in one direction and then immediately turned the opposite. I can detect this slight nil focus section in between the two focus movements.
Leif said:I have heard several reasons from several InFocus salesmen, and there is a common theme or two. I heard twice that InFocus were unimpressed with the responsiveness of Leica to service issues. (Not honouring the guarantee when some binoculars flooded was one 'story'.) I heard once that the margin given by Leica (i.e. profit) was too small. I heard on another occasion that InFocus bought a large stock of Leica kit, and were hit badly (lost a lot of money) when Leica then lowered the RRP. That last story is at least consistent with the low profit margin story.
The problem is that these are all second hand 'stories' and you never know who started them and why. The low profit margin lineat least has the ring of truth about it.
I think another reason why they don't (but I still think they should...) is owing to the cost of holding such a significantly expensive stock item with a relatively slow stock turnover.Colin said:Second point. I may be wrong here but one of the factors why In Focus do not sell Leica may well be the small profit margin because I believe that In Focus have an agreement with The Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust (where many of their outlets are situated) that a percentage of the takings goes to them which would effectively make the profit margin even smaller.
And although they fixed my CP4500 within a week and have been very helpful on the phone, it looks as if I've got to wait at least another fortnight (which will make the best part of two months or more) to get my scope back from Nikon. Apparently, they are out of stock of spare ED82 lens hoods - what?!?Ragna said:Nikon had my 4500 for over a month just to remap a dead pixel and this included me taking them back and collecting, and they weren't too helpful.
scampo said:I think another reason why they don't (but I still think they should...) is owing to the cost of holding such a significantly expensive stock item with a relatively slow stock turnover.