helenol said:
Is there a difference between the various optics companies regarding guarantees they provide when purchasing binoculars? I'm thinking more along the lines of Leica/Zeiss/Nikon/Swarovski et al.
Or are they pretty much standard these days, and does it depend on which model one purchases?
The big 4 all offer some sort of long term or lifetime warranty. Some claim to be no-fault, some claim to be transferrable.
It's my understanding the Leica Passport warranty is a no fault warranty. As long as you could ship the pieces in they would fix it or give you a new one. When I bought my BAs several years ago, the Passport warranty was good for 3 years. Near the end I was tempted to toss them under some heavy equipment, but I was either too honest or too chicken.
Perhaps something to be more concerned about is how those companies interpret their warranty when you have a problem to fix. Relatively cheap repairs are certainly more likely to get addressed than expensive ones. I think any company can find an out when they want too.
In the US, Swarovski has an excellent reputation of replacing small parts and doing small repairs free of charge. I had Pentax USA repair a scope with a non-functional focus knob for just a nominal fee to cover shipping (and I had never sent the registration in). A friend of mine had a Fujinon scope come apart in the middle as a result of a major auto accident. Fujinon put it back together for free. He's not real critical about optics, so I dont' know if its as good as it was, but he is happy.
Among photographers in the US, Nikon had a horrible reputation. I see within the last few years their warranty offerings have been greatly enhanced. Don't know if they are "walking their talk".
I'm going to try out Leica's service soon by sending in my BAs for a tuneup. We'll see how it goes.
IMO, no matter what is in writing, its still abit of a crap shoot. If you really need the gauge the issue, I suggest talking to other optics owners and store personnel to see how brand performance has been.