• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Related (1 Viewer)

My question to that article is, if chickens and ostriches are closer to T. rex than anoles, what is the common ancestor between T. rex and anoles?
 
T-Rex is closely (and equally) related to all birds.

Ostrich and chicken are more closely related to each other than either is to T-Rex. And both are more closely related to T-Rex than they are to the anole.

The last common ancestor of the T-Rex and the anole is also an ancestor of the birds.
 
T-Rex is closely (and equally) related to all birds.

Ostrich and chicken are more closely related to each other than either is to T-Rex. And both are more closely related to T-Rex than they are to the anole.

The last common ancestor of the T-Rex and the anole is also an ancestor of the birds.

You misunderstood my question, Cacicus. Of course they highlight "chicken" (Gallus gallus) and "ostrich" (Struthio camelus) as familiar birds for the general public. But it should be noted that these two examples fall interestingly into the two older groups of the three core modern bird groupings: Palaeognathae and Galloanserae (the third being Neoaves). Also, of course those birds are closer related to T. rex than they are to anoles, but what the article says is that T. rex is closer to birds than it is to anoles. THAT is interesting - and warrants the question what is/how long ago lived the common ancestor of anoles and T. rex (and intrinsically birds)?
 
I always have a tendency to take Wikipedia with a grain of salt, but the read of dinosaurs in there is definitely interesting. It seems that dinosaurs (incl. birds) and crocodiles share a common grouping called archosaurs. Going back, the only part of reptiles that were already different when this groups had its common ancestor with lizards was turtles.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reptile

Niels
 
You misunderstood my question, Cacicus. Of course they highlight "chicken" (Gallus gallus) and "ostrich" (Struthio camelus) as familiar birds for the general public. But it should be noted that these two examples fall interestingly into the two older groups of the three core modern bird groupings: Palaeognathae and Galloanserae (the third being Neoaves). Also, of course those birds are closer related to T. rex than they are to anoles, but what the article says is that T. rex is closer to birds than it is to anoles. THAT is interesting - and warrants the question what is/how long ago lived the common ancestor of anoles and T. rex (and intrinsically birds)?

Ah.... sorry for the misunderstanding... Well, the last common ancestor of the lepidosaurs (the group that includes the lizards) and the archosaurs (the group that includes crocodiles, dinosaurs and birds) probably lived in the Permian period, about 270 million years ago. It was a diapsid (a reptile with two holes in its skull), but it didn't have any of the characteristics that define the Archosauria (such as a hole in the bone of the mandible) or the Lepidosauria.

We don't know exactly what this animal was, but it surely was very similar to some examples of early diapsids including Younginia ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Younginia ) and Petrolacosaurus ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrolacosaurus )
 
Warning! This thread is more than 16 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top