• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Cammo jacket (1 Viewer)

I agree - I have a WWS cover for one lens and Lenscoat on another and I far prefer the WWS one. In fact when I have the spare cash I'll replace my Lenscoat with a WWS cover.
 
I also agree with the comments above, I have a WWS cover on my Sigma 300 f2.8 and prefer it to the Lenscoat one I had on a previous lens
 
Just got a WWS cover for my 150-500mm OS Sigma and excellent quality and very fast delivery + Kevin a real nice guy to deal with
 
Just out of interest, with those who have both the WW and the Lens Coat versions what are the advantages to the WW version over the LensCoat? I've a Lens Coat for my 70-200mm and had no real problems with it, though I'd be interested in hearing about the WW versions (got to get something to cover my 120-300mm)
 
Warning! This thread is more than 12 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top