scampo said:I have heard from an RSPB warden that the sparrowhawk population is now at its maximum and that it might now naturally decline a little to a more sustainable level.
Jane Turner said:No you are not missing something As had been said that was largely due to DDT artificialy reducing the breeding success of Sparrowhawks and other raptors....so again being simplistic about this.. all other things being equal, you could argue that the passerine population in the period was at a higher level than the dwindling resources of the ecosytem could naturally support.
Jane Turner said:It will decline quite sharply if there isn't a recovery in its food, which is now the limiting factor on its population size
Anthony Morton said:Unless I'm very much mistaken this is exactly the point that pigeon fanciers are making. During the last 10 years or so predation on racing pigeons has increased considerably as the Sparrowhawk's usual prey species have declined. This has enabled them to maintain their numbers at a higher level that the available passerine population would suggest.
Anthony
I would think that we are all in agreement that after it`s discovery in 1945 it had a negative effect on the environment.Jane Turner said:DDT acts as a cumulative poison that effects egg-shell thickness, which is why it had such a perncius effect on raptors. They ate numbers of small birds with trace ammount of the chemical and concentrated within their bodies.
Another possible reason for peregrines catching pigeons easier is the problem of hybrids.scampo said:I reckon that a problems with racing pigeons is that they seem to have lost the native ability to dodge out of the way of predators. Watching a peregrine go for a wood pigeon is very different from watching a peregrine go for a racer. The latter it never misses; the former is fascinating to watch - there's almost time to put bets on!
Jane Turner said:
Hi Anthony,Anthony Morton said:Thanks for that. I've looked at both sites and accept that the effects of DDT on raptors was more pronounced due to the build-up of the toxins they were ingesting by being at the top of the food chain.
But are you saying that the same toxins did not have at least some effect on the passerine population and that their system is somehow able to tolerate it?
Given that DDT is carcinogenic to humans, wouldn't it have affected the songbirds in some way as well and is the effect of an amount of toxin linked directly to the bodyweight of the individual host?
Suricate said:I would think that we are all in agreement that after it`s discovery in 1945 it had a negative effect on the environment.
But are the new newer Organochlorines like aldrin or carbamate insecticides as bad if not worse.
There will be the call that many of the new pesticides are banned, but I dont` think so!
Aldicard is used as asystemic pesticide on potatoes, sugar beet carrots and other root crops and is is proven to affect, insects,birds, fish and even bees, this obviously is in part a reason for declining Bee species. Is there a way forward ?.
Suricate
Anthony Morton said:Thanks for that. I've looked at both sites and accept that the effects of DDT on raptors was more pronounced due to the build-up of the toxins they were ingesting by being at the top of the food chain.
But are you saying that the same toxins did not have at least some effect on the passerine population and that their system is somehow able to tolerate it?
Given that DDT is carcinogenic to humans, wouldn't it have affected the songbirds in some way as well and is the effect of an amount of toxin linked directly to the bodyweight of the individual host?
Jane Turner said:Well as long as they carry on eating pigeons that ok. Plenty of them in urban envirnments. Mind you Sparrowhawks aren't much good a catching pigeons... big females can just about manage a Collared Dove if they are hungry.
saluki said:Sorry Jane, but that isn't correct. I've stated before that a female Spar devastated our pigeon loft when I lived in Argyll. We had a Peregrine nesting site within sight of the property, but they didn't cause anywhere near the amount of damage one particular female Spar caused. I'm not condemning Spars as a species (I've kept Spars, on and off, since I was eleven years old, they're probably my favourite bird) but they are quite capable of taking pigeons. They take Woodpigeons which, if you've ever held one in your hands, you'll know that they are far stronger than the average loft pigeon.
saluki