• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Most misidentified birds in your area (1 Viewer)

The most popular field guide to Costa Rica is from 2014. Since then a species (Gray-necked Wood-Rail) has been split into Gray-cowled Wood-Rail and Rufous-naped Wood-Rail. Where I live on the Caribbean side it is Rufous-naped. At least once or twice a week there is a Gray-cowled Wood-Rail listed in the rare bird alert. It doesn't help that a local popular nature reserve has a sign up on their trails where it's labeled wrongly as being Gray-cowled.
To be fair, the two species look SO similar and there are few sources that discuss their range limits. Do they overlap at all? I literally don't know.

I suppose I should ask you: the wood-rails I saw in La Fortuna would have been Russet-naped, correct? And the ones at Hacienda Baru would have been Gray-cowled? I'm pretty sure I have it right but it's been hard to confirm.
 
To be fair, the two species look SO similar and there are few sources that discuss their range limits. Do they overlap at all? I literally don't know.

I suppose I should ask you: the wood-rails I saw in La Fortuna would have been Russet-naped, correct? And the ones at Hacienda Baru would have been Gray-cowled? I'm pretty sure I have it right but it's been hard to confirm.

Yes they do overlap in some areas where you'd have to ID them by voice primarily. Principally the Russet-naped is Caribbean (so yes Fortuna was that one) and Pacific side is Gray-cowled (Baru is farther south than where they mixed so good there too). They overlap in the Pacific Northwest where the Russet-naped is primarily on the northern part of the Nicoya Peninsula (which is the Pacific side of the country) and the Gray-cowled is primarily in the south. However at some IBA's like Palo Verde they overlap.
 
If there only was a way to deal with this issue that would not depend on the work of a few overworked reviewers ...
 
Right... I even volunteered to work as a reviewer only focused on this type of common stuff rather than tricky or rare IDs but never heard back. The eBird rep did say they were looking to bring some more people on but just haven't gotten around to it.
 
Currently, there are even more undeveloped areas like much of the High Seas region (still) has no dedicated filter at all, which gives hope that they'll come round to it after they've plugged the more gaping holes.

The birds that are not rare but not common either might be a loophole indeed, as I think I've seen signs of such instances where I live as well.
 
Currently, there are even more undeveloped areas like much of the High Seas region (still) has no dedicated filter at all, which gives hope that they'll come round to it after they've plugged the more gaping holes.

The birds that are not rare but not common either might be a loophole indeed, as I think I've seen signs of such instances where I live as well.
I was told by a reviewer that eBird is launching brand new pelagic filters that will completely change how they're handled.
 
Well I obviously meant allowing the common users to dispute identifications. But for some people, this is such an unthinkable blasphemy that I doubt it will ever happen.

As a first step, having more reviewers would certainly also help, considering that in places like Egypt, the bar for "more" is now set at zero...

But I think this really should not have been a thread on eBird.
 
Tufted titmouse is somewhat regularly reported here in central Texas (Travis and Williamson counties). They seem to be uncommon, but regular, at the eastern edges of the county, although the nearest ones I've seen are another 30 miles east.
However, newer birders, or those unfamiliar with the area, report them with regularity around the Austin area. Central Austin and the nearby suburbs are smack dab in the hybrid zone with black-crested titmouse. Some observers seem to be aware of black-crested, and maybe even the presence of hybrids, based on their eBird comments, however they don't realize the lack of a black crest with a lighter forehead patch still constitutes a hybrid.
For that matter, black-crested may be over-reported as well. I suppose where you draw a line between full species and hybrid complicates matters too.
 
Tufted titmouse is somewhat regularly reported here in central Texas (Travis and Williamson counties). They seem to be uncommon, but regular, at the eastern edges of the county, although the nearest ones I've seen are another 30 miles east.
However, newer birders, or those unfamiliar with the area, report them with regularity around the Austin area. Central Austin and the nearby suburbs are smack dab in the hybrid zone with black-crested titmouse. Some observers seem to be aware of black-crested, and maybe even the presence of hybrids, based on their eBird comments, however they don't realize the lack of a black crest with a lighter forehead patch still constitutes a hybrid.
For that matter, black-crested may be over-reported as well. I suppose where you draw a line between full species and hybrid complicates matters too.
I noted all titmice in Georgetown and Austin as Black-crested (back in 1995 when I spent 3 months there and the area was much, much emptier), but I guess in hindsight it's then better to note them as Tufted × Black-crested? I remember I was happy to see one at Santa Ana, although it didn't look much different to me.
All my "genuine" Tufted Titmice in Texas are in the Piney Woods.
 
I'm not sure if/how the hybrid zone has moved over time. I've only been here since 2021, although the ID challenge existed where I lived west of Fort Worth the preceeding 2 years. There certainly are "pure" black-crested within Austin city limits. They're just mixed in with a good number of hybrids.
I believe that the consensus is it's considered a black-crested if the crest is jet black, even if there is some brown on the forehead. An intermediate-colored crest OR a light crest with light brown rather than black on the forehead falls into the hybrid category.
 
People obviously misidentify birds sometimes and there are some well-known species pairs or groups that are pretty hard to get right. My interest in this thread is not necessarily in general cases of hard identifications but in locally specific errors that regularly occur in particular places or regions. I think it can be revealing of how birders approach identification, particularly when they're starting out or are unfamiliar with an area.

I'm mainly a local patch birder at Girdle Ness in Aberdeen. I often bump into visiting birders and also check lists people post on sites like Ebird or Birdtrack from here. I think I have a pretty good idea of what birds are common here and in what sort of numbers, so I'm often curious when visiting birders seem to be seeing things that I don't tend to see or in numbers that seem really unusual. Of course, I might be missing stuff and they might genuinely be seeing things that are unusual, but there tend to be some species that fairly consistently get misidentified in the area. I'll go through a few of the commoner examples.

Black-throated Diver
Black-throated Diver is pretty rare here. I think it's maybe marginally commoner than White-billed Diver, but not by that much. Probably 95% of divers I see are Red-throated, and most of the remaining 5% are Great Northern. A fraction of 1% are White-billed or Black-throated. I think other local birders see them at the same kind of rate. But visiting birders often seem to see them, sometimes in quite good numbers. They're usually a bit surprised when I say how rare they are. I've lived in eastern Scotland for 26 years and, away from the Forth and Moray coasts where they seem regular, Black-throated Diver is pretty rare in my experience. I've probably seen fewer than 10 away from those core areas.

Lesser Black-backed Gull
LBBs are common residents everywhere in Britain aren't they? Well, no. In northeast Scotland, they're basically a summer visitor. At Girdle Ness between mid-October and late February, I've seen two in ten years. They're quite a bit rarer than Glaucous or Iceland Gulls, for example. But other people's lists frequently have LBBs on them during this time of year. I saw a list from Girdle Ness the other day that had a count of five. I've not seen one here since mid-September! This is maybe one of those cases where people just assume they're around and don't look too closely at the 'black-backed gulls'.

Goosander/ Red-breasted Merganser
Obviously these are quite similar species but there's a particular variant of their confusion that's common in eastern Scotland more generally. I think some birders assume that if they're anywhere near the sea, they're RBMs. But Goosander form large moulting flocks in summer and these are often around river mouths or in coastal waters. These are always getting mis-IDed as RBMs. We get a moulting flock of 50-100 at Girdle Ness in summer and every year, I'll see a list on Ebird or Birdtrack with a count of 50+ RBMs on it. We do get them here, fairly commonly, but not in those numbers.

Twite
You get Twite in Scotland don't you? Linnets in England; Twite in Scotland. That's how it works. Well, sadly Twite is no longer very common in most parts of Scotland and I haven't seen one at Girdle Ness for over a decade. Since then, I think there have only been one or two reliable records. Lots of claims though, usually in late summer when tonnes of juvenile Linnets are about.

Tree Pipit
Girdle Ness is good for migrants, so there must be good chances of Tree Pipit. Well, we do get them but they're surprisingly scarce and most records are flyovers. Quite often I'll see records online of Tree Pipits here, usually at odd times of the year. These aren't definitely wrong, but I suspect most of them are.

Purple Sandpiper
This is maybe the most locally specific one here and is a bit unusual in that it's a case of a species being much commoner than people think rather than rarer. We regularly get a roost of 200+. If you see a large flock of Calidris waders here, they will be Purps. We get other small waders too, but never in those sorts of numbers. Every year, I see reports of 200+ Dunlins though. Not a serious mistake but that would be a massive record count for here. We get Dunlin regularly, mostly as a passage migrant and usually in single figures. It's an interesting case where sometimes the bird apps don't help. Routine counts of 200+ Purple Sandpipers often get flagged as unusual by Ebird/ Birdtrack, while a similar count of Dunlin wouldn't, despite being far less likely. I sometimes wonder if that's a source for some of the misIDs. I also once saw an unusually high count of Redshanks from a visiting birder that I suspect were also Purps.

These examples aren't intended to belittle birders who may be inexperienced or are new to the area. It's mostly just to look at the local specifics of identification and some of the surprises and challenges this can throw up. I'd be interested in other examples from other areas. I'd also add that I've definitely casually misidentified things myself when travelling around, particularly in other countries.
yeah there is plenty purple sandpipers but they might be more well known if more of them bred in scotland, only a couple breed on ben macdui and braeriach annually so all them u see at the harbour are from norway and arctic countries etc.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top