henry link
Well-known member
I had all of them at one point. The problem with the 8x35 was very short eye relief, 9.2mm. Otherwise just as good as the 7x35.
I knew you were familiar with the "E" series, I just admire the workmanship and ease of view through the 7X35 "E". I don't care for all the plastic in the Action bins but they do serve a purpose!$$I know about the E series, I have mint samples in 8X30 and 10X35, as well as the later E II series, and all SE model formats. These Action models were a lower budget glass, and they offered wide fields of view. I am not comparing, just making an observation on how I was impressed with the views.
Your photos above are beautiful! I just bought a new Canon G7X Mark II as I miss my digital SLR. (The peregrine falcon in my signature was taken with my older canon EOS and a canon 400mm f/4 lens) The G7X is all metal and the zoom is f/1.8-f/2.8 (8.8-36.8mm). I can't wait for warm weather!!I accidentally posted here in general thread, but I wanted to post in "Nikon" thread
John , that’s a great write up! Thank you.To complement Henry’s link in post #23, which includes the specifications for various ‘lesser’ Nikon Porro prism lines . . .
A) Nikon’s premier hand held Porro prism lines, following WWII were as follows:
1948 - Mikron (the Mikron designation was once used on most of the binocular lines)
- - - -
1959 - A model (A = aluminium?, not marked on unit; new eyepiece)
1969 - A model continues (only a change to markings, from Nikon Kogaku to Nikon; and from now on, no markings on RH prism plate)
- - - -
1978 - E model (E = Execulite, not marked on unit; new eyepiece with longer eye relief, and folding rubber eyecup)
1988 - E model updated (C = Criterion, marked on LH prism plate; same design now multicoated)
- - - -
1999 - EII model (EII not marked on unit; all new body with sloped prism plates, along with new prisms and eyepiece; longer eye relief and widest FOV;
and still in production)
- - - -
And
1998 - SE model (SE = Superior E; rubber coated; new design with field flattener lenses and longest eye relief; discontinued in 2008)
- - - -
From 1948 the binoculars had single coated lenses, and from 1988 with the update to the E version they've been multicoated.
And as can be seen, during the period there was at least a cosmetic upgrading on a roughly 10 year basis.
B) And specifications for the various lines, in reverse chronological order:
Those for the SE, EII and E are all from the manuals provided with the binoculars
Those for the A series are from a 1977 flyer at the Pacific Rim Camera site: Pacific Rim Camera Reference Library
And the Mikron data is from a 1951 brochure at the Miniature Binoculars site: https://www.miniaturebinoculars.com/part2/Page21529.htm
For more links and images about older Nikon Porros also see: Resources About Discontinued Nikon Binoculars & Nikon History
John
Hi Paul,John , that’s a great write up! Thank you.
what can you say about the qualitative differences between the 7x35E and the 7x35EC , criterion Model?
I understand one is single coded and one is multicoated, but observationally what can be observed differently? Is the say substantial difference or only noticeable on the certain circumstances?
Could anybody else with direct knowledge of the two ad some to the conversation please.
Thank you
Paul
I might be miss understandin,Hi Paul,
I find the coating used on my multicoated E series models (7x35 and 8x30) bought around 1990-91 to be indistinguishable from the multicoating used on my E IIs (8x30 and 10x35) bought around 2005-6. The image is obviously brighter under all conditions compared to my earlier single coated Es (2 8x30s). Also the contrast is higher and the color bias is much more neutral than my older Es, which besides being somewhat dim also have a decidedly yellow bias like many other single coated binoculars. Compared to the most color neutral current binoculars the image in my multicoated Es and EIIs looks a little reddish.
Henry
Hi John,To complement Henry’s link in post #23, which includes the specifications for various ‘lesser’ Nikon Porro prism lines . . .
A) Nikon’s premier hand held Porro prism lines, following WWII were as follows:
1948 - Mikron (the Mikron designation was once used on most of the binocular lines)
- - - -
1959 - A model (A = aluminium?, not marked on unit; new eyepiece)
1969 - A model continues (only a change to markings, from Nikon Kogaku to Nikon; and from now on, no markings on RH prism plate)
- - - -
1978 - E model (E = Execulite, not marked on unit; new eyepiece with longer eye relief, and folding rubber eyecup)
1988 - E model updated (C = Criterion, marked on LH prism plate; same design now multicoated)
- - - -
1999 - EII model (EII not marked on unit; all new body with sloped prism plates, along with new prisms and eyepiece; longer eye relief and widest FOV;
and still in production)
- - - -
And
1998 - SE model (SE = Superior E; rubber coated; new design with field flattener lenses and longest eye relief; discontinued in 2008)
- - - -
From 1948 the binoculars had single coated lenses, and from 1988 with the update to the E version they've been multicoated.
And as can be seen, during the period there was at least a cosmetic upgrading on a roughly 10 year basis.
B) And specifications for the various lines, in reverse chronological order:
Those for the SE, EII and E are all from the manuals provided with the binoculars
Those for the A series are from a 1977 flyer at the Pacific Rim Camera site: Pacific Rim Camera Reference Library
And the Mikron data is from a 1951 brochure at the Miniature Binoculars site: https://www.miniaturebinoculars.com/part2/Page21529.htm
For more links and images about older Nikon Porros also see: Resources About Discontinued Nikon Binoculars & Nikon History
John
Still a little confused 🤔. If you bought in the 1990’s they would be EII not E’s. Unless you bought them used. What I believe, if you have an EII they are multi coated , with the newest update of the EII coatings were started 2017. Anything before EII is the E, which started with single coatings. Then came the E criterion model marked with a C on the prism plate.Hi Paul,
I find the coating used on my multicoated E series models (7x35 and 8x30) bought around 1990-91 to be indistinguishable from the multicoating used on my E IIs (8x30 and 10x35) bought around 2005-6. The image is obviously brighter under all conditions compared to my earlier single coated Es (2 8x30s). Also the contrast is higher and the color bias is much more neutral than my older Es, which besides being somewhat dim also have a decidedly yellow bias like many other single coated binoculars. Compared to the most color neutral current binoculars the image in my multicoated Es and EIIs looks a little reddish.
Henry
Henry would post the serial numbers of the two 8x30’s and the 7x35 you have? or private conversation me. I just bought another E for my collection from eBay. It looked good with box and all papers but it’s an E. I don’t think it’s multicoated.Hi Paul,
I find the coating used on my multicoated E series models (7x35 and 8x30) bought around 1990-91 to be indistinguishable from the multicoating used on my E IIs (8x30 and 10x35) bought around 2005-6. The image is obviously brighter under all conditions compared to my earlier single coated Es (2 8x30s). Also the contrast is higher and the color bias is much more neutral than my older Es, which besides being somewhat dim also have a decidedly yellow bias like many other single coated binoculars. Compared to the most color neutral current binoculars the image in my multicoated Es and EIIs looks a little reddish.
Henry
Earlier E Series': Numbering, Production and Popularity
In contrast to the EII, previous versions of the E series were far more popular, and increasingly so as one goes back in time - when they were Nikon's premium binocular line
Bear in mind that prior to the introduction of phase coating on roof prism binoculars (developed and first used by Zeiss in 1988), it was not possible for roof prisms to equal the sharpness of Porro prisms
And the availability of affordable roof prism models of good optical quality, that we now take for granted, did not commence until the first decade of the 21st century
So as context for many, and nostalgia for some . . .
A) Multi Coated E Series - from 1988 to 1998 (90k+ over 11 years)
- 8x30 from 400k: 400,174 - 448,643+ (48k+)
- 10x35 from 600k: 600,542 to 615,676+ (15k+)
- 7x35 from 200k: 200,347 to 217,591+ (17k+)
- 12x40 from 800k: 800,204 to 811,718+ (11k+)
B) Single Coated E Series - 1978 to 1987 (180k+ over 10 years)
- 8x30 from 880k: 880,276 to 936,734+ (56k+)
- 10x35 from 110k: 114,772 to 153,420+ (43k+)
- 7x35 from 770k: 770,100 to 818,427+ (48k+)
- 12x40 from 660k: 661,428 to 693,341+ (33k+)
John
p.s. again the numbering is from my observations
Still a little confused 🤔. If you bought in the 1990’s they would be EII not E’s. Unless you bought them used. What I believe, if you have an EII they are multi coated , with the newest update of the EII coatings were started 2017. Anything before EII is the E, which started with single coatings. Then came the E criterion model marked with a C on the prism plate.
The three are Nikon A series, then E C (criterion Multi coated) then the EII (2020 from last run). Between the A and EC would be an E without multi-coatings.
Henry would post the serial numbers of the two 8x30’s and the 7x35 you have? or private conversation me. I just bought another E for my collection from eBay. It looked good with box and all papers but it’s an E. I don’t think it’s multicoated.
Thank you
paul