I think an ortho increases the contrast, not the resolution. And I use my 42-degree eyepieces for that superior contrast on everything, not just planets. The reason for the improved contrast is fewer lens elements to scatter light & degrade the image, something that applies to bino oculars as well as astro. But we're digressing and on the wrong website for this
btw, it's the Allbinos review that's long in the tooth, not the new EDG I purchased 6 months ago. I believe their 10x42 EDG review was done in 2011? We don't know if Nikon updated the coatings since then.
PS, Allbinos found 89% transmission in both the 2011 EDG and current NL, so that punctures the superior transparency idea a little....conversely they reported 93% transmission on the 10x42 Zeiss SF's....
PPS....it just occurred to me the word "binoculars" is a fusion of "bino" and "ocular"....cool! I think I like the German "Far-glass" better though