Yet current favorite porto is the Vixen Foresta 7x50. It certainly provides alpha level image quality plus that tantalizing 3D effect.
Maybe you own such and would never consider an Alpha roof ?
I`m really bitten by a good Porro`s view, and aim to add the best I can find to my modest binocular collection.
Current best Porro Optolyth Alpin 8x30.
But how many 7x50 Forestas have an exceptional close focus like your sample? The listed close focus is 38.2 ft. That doesn't mean it's not a "alpha quality" but the alphas we discuss on BF are for bird watching, and a 38 ft. close focus is not "birdworthy" for a 7x bin, I'd opine.
<B>
What was the last Zeiss porro of note ?
Did`nt know there was a 10x35EII, what about the 10x42SE ?, this might also compliment my others ?
I just did that. I missed my Nikon 8x30 EII so I bought one from a guy in the UK. $500.00 shipped and it is supposed to be as new. The Vortex Talon 8x32 HD lost it's appeal after trying it's bigger brother and I want something with a big FOV. He had it on E-bay and I made a deal with him. I really feel EII's and SE's value are going to skyrocket with their increasing scarcity. Get one why you can if you like porro's.The truth is there are MANY porros that offer an alpha roof quality of view. In center focus porros the Nikon EII's, Nikon SE's, and Swaro Habicht's all provide alpha views. If using your a porro for long range terrestrial viewing or for astronomy consider one of IF focus marine/astronomy binoculars from Fujinon, Nikon, or Pentax. I've also heard that some of the Swift Audubon porros are really great but have no experience with them.
Some people don't like to hear it (they take it as a personal slur against their alpha roof) but I currently use several porros that match my alpha roofs optically. If I were you and wanting to purchase a great porro I would snatch up a 8x30 EII while they're still available on you side of the pond.....Nikon doesn't offer them here anymore.
Steve
" the SE's are much easier to acquire in the US however"I've been very impressed with the Nikon 10x42 SE and believe it compares quite favorably with my Zeiss 7x42 TFL in terms of view quality. Obviously there are differences in terms of the type of view between these two and my experience with the SE is limited to the past two weeks as it's a recent purchase, but I did use them both extensively on a weeklong flyfishing/birding trip to the Blackfeet reservation in Montana.
It falls short in the areas you would expect as it's not as well protected versus the elements (I had no issues during the trip but used the Zeiss on rainy days) and the differences inherent between 7 and 10x but is certainly alpha level in terms of the view. I've never had the opportunity to work with the Nikon EII's but understand that they are excellent as well- the SE's are much easier to acquire in the US however.
Both the SE and EII have a great view. The SE view is a flatter, smaller FOV and sharper to the edge and the EII has a huge FOV with less sharp edges but IMO you don't notice them because the FOV is so big. The EII is like standing OUTSIDE the binocular and looking at the bird. I like them both but prefer the EII. I also prefer the size and ergonomics of the EII. Both of them are getting hard to find.I've Nikon 8x42 HG purchased new (not by me) in the year 2000 for £1000 and the view, wonderful as it is, is eclipsed by the view through my 8x32 SEs (500xxx serial) which I believe date from around 1998 (i.e. pre eco-glass).
If you can live with lack of waterproofing and I think you will have to with porros, and you don't suffer the reported "black-out" issues with the SE models, then 8x32SE will give you the most terrific view you can get, never mind the best view you can get for your money.