• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Ardeidae (1 Viewer)

The uncompressed data includes close to 5,000 files, for a total of about 4 Gb, it's not something that can be attached to an email.
If you have a relatively recent version of Windows (I assume you use Windows, otherwise the problem would not even occur), it seems you should be able to extract .tar.gz files without installing third-party software, using the command line -- see the first procedure described here. (I don't have a computer running Windows at hand to test if this really works, though.)
Most of it is genetic sequences (.phylip, .nex, .fasta files) and individual gene trees (.tre files). Can I ask what you want to do with it, exactly ? Is there a part of it in which you would be particularly interested ?
I wanted phylogenetic trees. I saw the phylip format, I don't even know what it is.

I downloaded 7-zip as recommended to me by The Fern. There are more than 3000 trees 😐
 
The cox1 distance between alba (n=8, Sweden, Germany, Austria, Japan) and egretta (n=12, Argentina, Suriname, Salvador, Mexico, USA) is 2.4%.
The cox1 distance between Asian (in BOLD: n=13, S Korea, Japan; additional seqs in GenBank: n=6, China, India) and Australian (n=1) modesta is about 2%.

The cox1 distance between modesta and the [alba + egretta] clade is 4.2-5.2%.

For comparison, the cox1 distances between species in the Ardea cinerea / herodias / cocoi complex are 1.3-1.4%.

If Asian vs. Australian modesta were to be split, is there an available name for the split taxon (which offhand I would presume would need to be the Australian birds, but I haven't confirmed the type locality of modesta)?

Edit: And delving into answering my own question, there is a maoriensis listed on Avibase, if that's a valid name.

Edit 2: Looking at a map, though, the distribution of modesta shows no clear breaks. I wonder if that cox1 distance could represent ends of a cline?
 
Last edited:
Thanks Laurent for the detective work ! And the genetic tree provides great info.

It would seem that there are about similar arguments for splitting Intermediate Egret and Great Egret: Considerable genetic distance, morphological differences and some vocal differences. Relatively strong cases I would think (with still some genetic data lacking here and there).

In the case of Great Egret, a split into 3 (rather than 2) species seems the better approach when integrating all arguments.
(Unless there would be clear morphological or vocal differences, a further split of the Australian birds seems premature)
The alarm call of Great Egret seems to get deeper the further southeast you go. At least all Old World birds have a rattling call, but it would be interesting to know if there was a clean break between high and low pitch somewhere.
American birds sound completely different and should be split without hesitation.
 
The alarm call of Great Egret seems to get deeper the further southeast you go. At least all Old World birds have a rattling call, but it would be interesting to know if there was a clean break between high and low pitch somewhere.
American birds sound completely different and should be split without hesitation.
See conclusion in my note on Great Egret vocalizations mentioned above:

<<Subspecies egretta apparently doesn’t utter the rattle call, which is the commonest call in Old World races (or it is uttered so fast that it looks identical to the "rraah" call). The vocabulary of egretta consists mainly of the “rraah” call and the nasal call. While these two call types are also uttered by Old World races, especially the nasal call is rather an exception, and never reaches the extreme nasal rendering of egretta (see above sonograms). There is thus a clear difference in vocalizations. (The total absence of a homologous call could be given a score of 4 using Tobias criteria for the largest possible difference, or alternatively pace of the “commonest call” for egretta could be compared with other races, also leading to a score of 3–4).

Differences among the Old World races are less obvious, and a more detailed analysis with more samples is required. It would seem, however, that modesta has a rattle call that is clearly lower-pitched with energy packed in the lower frequencies, unlike the nominate which is noticeably higher-pitched (estimated score 2). Race melanorhynchos may be intermediate, but recordings of this taxon are too few to draw any conclusions. Similar differences may be true in respect of the “rraah” call.

I conclude that the voice of egretta especially stands apart, while other races show smaller differences, which may nevertheless be statistically significant. >>
 
The alarm call of Great Egret seems to get deeper the further southeast you go. At least all Old World birds have a rattling call, but it would be interesting to know if there was a clean break between high and low pitch somewhere.
American birds sound completely different and should be split without hesitation.
Although are differences in alarm call going to influence conspecific recognition? Which is really why folks are interested in vocalizations, although differences can at least suggest differences in evolutionary trajectories between populations.
 
Although are differences in alarm call going to influence conspecific recognition? Which is really why folks are interested in vocalizations, although differences can at least suggest differences in evolutionary trajectories between populations.
Great Egrets have fairly energetic courtship displays, so I would expect that would be the more fertile ground for BSC split arguments. I agree that alarm call dialects may have geographic variation but not necessarily any utility toward teasing out species limits. But even their pair-bonding calls are learned and each pair modifies/individualizes their vocalizations according to Birds of the World.

I think the coloration of the bare parts would be more important to the birds than vocalizations might be. They change during the breeding season, so we know they mean something. We need to know if the differences in lore, bill, and leg color mean as much to the birds as they do to us.
 
If Bubulcus were to be merged into Ardea, would the gender be changed for coromandus to coromanda?

Yes.
(I think it may be questionable that this name is really an adjective, but the OS is coromanda -- should it be deemed not adjectival, it would be the currently accepted coromandus that would be problematic.)
 
Mendales (2023) Ultraconserved elements resolve the phylogeny of a globally distributed genus, Butorides (Masters thesis)


Supports idea that NW & OW forms represent separate lineages; also that sundevalli is most closely related to virescens.

I'm treating as 4-5 spp:

Butorides virescens
Butorides sundevalli
Butorides
striata
Butorides [a.] atricapilla
Butorides [a.] javanica
 
Mendales (2023) Ultraconserved elements resolve the phylogeny of a globally distributed genus, Butorides (Masters thesis)


Supports idea that NW & OW forms represent separate lineages; also that sundevalli is most closely related to virescens.

I'm treating as 4-5 spp:

Butorides virescens
Butorides sundevalli
Butorides
striata
Butorides [a.] atricapilla
Butorides [a.] javanica
How many species they recognise?
 
How would you divide the species and their subspecies (there are a lot)?

Green, Striated, Lava

The paper is freely available by following the link above.

The interesting results (to me) were Lava recovered as sister to Green and not Striated, and the one specimen of “Striated” sampled from the Galapagos grouped quite confidently with Lava, not with Striated, suggesting Lava is perhaps polymorphic. Additional comments suggested that plumage in old world forms did not correlate with genetics, perhaps further suggesting that plumage is fairly plastic and not very indicative.
 
How would you divide the species and their subspecies (there are a lot)?
Division amongst sampled OW sspp seems to be African/Indian Ocean v's Asian/Australasian and I have allocated sspp to follow this. However, there are some distinctive sspp on the Maldives & the Chagros Is and elsewhere which are not considered in this paper. A more thorough analyses would probably yield extra surprises.
 
The interesting results (to me) were Lava recovered as sister to Green and not Striated, and the one specimen of “Striated” sampled from the Galapagos grouped quite confidently with Lava, not with Striated, suggesting Lava is perhaps polymorphic.
This was also the opinion of the guides we had when I visited Galapagos several years ago. They felt Lava differed from Mainland Striated in among other things some characteristics of legs (heavier if I remember correctly) and it did not matter which color morph in Galapagos, they both had that characteristic. The guides included Alvaro Jaramillo.
Niels
 
This was also the opinion of the guides we had when I visited Galapagos several years ago. They felt Lava differed from Mainland Striated in among other things some characteristics of legs (heavier if I remember correctly) and it did not matter which color morph in Galapagos, they both had that characteristic. The guides included Alvaro Jaramillo.
Niels
I recall Alvaro Jaramillo, on Facebook somewhat recently, commenting that he thought that the "striated herons" in the Galapagos were just an alternative morph of Lava Heron, something these results seem to support. It's sort of reminds me of the Wurdemann's herons in the Florida Keys, which were considered hybrids by at least some authorities, but problably simply represent a different "morph" of Great White Heron.
 
This was also the opinion of the guides we had when I visited Galapagos several years ago. They felt Lava differed from Mainland Striated in among other things some characteristics of legs (heavier if I remember correctly) and it did not matter which color morph in Galapagos, they both had that characteristic. The guides included Alvaro Jaramillo.
Niels

Just to add, from the thesis linked above, the bill is said to be reliably heavier/thicker in Lava Heron than in mainland Striated.

Interesting stuff for sure. Also, Alvaro is a really keen and studious guy, he picks up on a lot of details and differences.
 
I found it interesting that the samples from northern Africa grouped w/ the Asian birds in the UCE analysis, while javanica grouped w/ the African birds in the mtDNA analysis. It makes me want to see a much more detailed study before any split within the Old World forms is suggested.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top